From Deseret News archives:

S.L. County Council eases restrictions on zoo bond

Published: Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2008 6:03 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Salt Lake County Council eased the restrictions on amultimillion dollar bond for the Hogle Zoo on Tuesday.

Now, if voters approve, the zoo must raise $11 million before the county will release $33 million in property-tax revenue. Then if the zoo wants any more money to finish its master plan, it must wait another five years.

It's not quite the $65 million the zoo wanted, but it will do, zoo director Craig Dinsmore said. The zoo still needs to finish its $85 million master plan, so the zoo will likely be back again to ask for more public funding in the future, he said.

"We're happy to have the opportunity now to go to the voters and place the emphasis on convincing the voters that the animals of Hogle Zoo need help, better homes, and we're prepared to do that," Dinsmore said. "We're very confident that the voters want to do this kind of thing, they want to help the zoo continue to improve."

Last month, the council voted to put a $65 million zoo bond on the ballot, but required the zoo to first raise $20 million in two years before seeing a penny in public funding. Zoo officials cried foul and pleaded with the council to reconsider.

Story continues below
Councilman Mark Crockett originally voted against the proposal, but said he was open to compromise because he hopes "this opens the door more for us to work cooperatively" in future decisions that need bipartisan support.

The compromise includes a clause that will send both Crockett and Councilman Joe Hatch out on a public-information campaign to inform voters about the financial needs of the county.

"We know there are probably some significant capital needs. I am going to be very clear in my address in saying I know this is coming down the pike," Hatch said. "Despite that, it's very important the public vote yes on this bond and approve it.

"There are other needs in the community, but this is well worth the cost. Other people may come to the other conclusions but it is clearly the voters who need that information to decide."

Crockett previously voted against the zoo bond because he said there were too many other needs the county must address with tax dollars instead of funding zoo improvements.

"I think this is a good compromise that will allow voters to make a choice with full information about all of the priorities," Crockett said.

The Utah Taxpayers Association thinks "this joint-communications strategy is going to be a wash."

Recent comments

Yes, only $4.00 a year (for people with a home worth $250,000 or...

Steve - Re: only $4 | Aug. 13, 2008 at 1:27 p.m.

Yeah right. Maybe on your TAXES but once these "improvements" are...

only $4 a year cost?? | Aug. 12, 2008 at 6:28 p.m.

I'm guessing you're the usual person who chimes in about their...

Steve - Re: Vote with your check | Aug. 12, 2008 at 5:51 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Come on is this really earth shattering news that a player admitted he hates...

Brems outlasts 2nd round of votes

Brems is the man for the job! Anyone who disagrees take it up with the board...

It is good to know that they are following Audrey's wishes with some of the...

I don't know why I waste my time reading these articles. I am contributing to...

Letters: Why stay in sports?

There is no good reason for universities to be involved with athletics. The...

The darling young girl who lost her life tonight is my neighbor. May this...

Y. student vanished in China

I don't think the story plays on the ignorance of Utah readers. It is known...

If the Oly v. Skyline game was a fluke, how do you explain Oly doubling your...

"This problem is a lot worse that what we believed in the beginning.." Sound...

Jazz win 6th in 7 games

Hey back off cowboy he has a right to say what he feels this a jazz fan blog....

Advertisements