Schools told to rewrite merit-based pay plans

It's much like a teacher who knows a student can do a better job and asks them to rewrite their essay and hand it in again.

Two school districts and six charter schools will be receiving a letter later this month from the State Office of Education. The notice will include advice and directions on revamping their performance-based compensation plan.

Until they receive the letters of instruction, all that districts and charter school officials know is that their plans were labeled as vague during discussions in State Board of Education meetings last week.

The merit-based plans are a result of SB281 from the 2008 legislative session. The Legislature earmarked $20 million in one-time funding for the compensation plans. The money will be doled out to districts based on enrollment.

USOE received 88 merit-pay plans for approval. Thirty-seven of the applications were from school districts while 51 were from charter schools.

During discussions last week, members of the state board decided eight school districts and charter schools need to beef up their plans.

The board is requiring the district or charter school to add more detail to their plan, have it approved again by the local board and send it back to USOE by Sept. 1.

The districts that need to add more information to their plans are Kane and Weber. The charter schools include Venture Academy, Providence Hall, Legacy Preparatory Academy, Paradigm High School, Odyssey Charter School and Noah Webster Academy.

Weber District's plan is site-based and is being developed by individual schools and specific district departments. District officials suspect the openness of the plan may have been what didn't sit well with state board members.

"Our initial intent was to give as much flexibility to the schools as possible," said Weber District spokesman Nate Taggart.

Weber's board approved the plan last month. Board president Jerry DeGroot said he and other board members saw no problems with it. "The board members were satisfied with the plan," DeGroot said.

He added he stands behind Weber's idea to give the schools latitude. "Weber board feels strongly that individual schools, principals and staff know what their individual needs are," DeGroot said.