From Deseret News archives:

West-side cities re-emphasizing opposition to toll for new road

Published: Monday, July 7, 2008 12:09 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
It's been a little more than a year since Salt Lake County's west-side cities started rallying against the idea that toll charges could be a way to pay for the Mountain View Corridor.

But several west-side cities are starting to re-emphasize their opposition to tolling by passing resolutions against that possibility in the hopes that it will be taken off the table once and for all.

"A year ago, basically, Utah's Department of Transportation said the tolling issue was dead," said West Jordan Mayor Dave Newton. "Then all of a sudden it started popping up again. The response of the cities is, 'Wait a minute, we had better make sure everyone understands our position.' We thought the issue had gone away, but apparently, it hasn't."

West Jordan passed a resolution in February 2007 encouraging the Legislature and UDOT to consider funding options other than tolling. Bluffdale, South Jordan and West Valley City signed similar resolutions at that time.

West Valley signed another resolution last week to reiterate its position that tolling is the "least desirable option" for funding the $2 billion-plus, 44-mile highway that is planned to stretch from I-80 in western Salt Lake County to northern Utah County. Taylorsville also recently discussed the resolution.

Story continues below
Other options to fund the road could include an increased gas tax, increased registration fees or increased costs for auto services, West Valley City Councilman Mike Winder said. None of those is desirable, but any one of them would share the burden, Winder said.

"I think it would be more beneficial to say, 'What's the lesser of the evils here?' because none of those are likable funding mechanisms," Winder said. "I would argue that as despised as increases in gas tax or registration fees are, those would be more equitable to everyone for the road, because then everyone in the state would share it, rather than just those on the west side."

UDOT studied tolling as a funding option at the request of the state Legislature, said UDOT spokesman Nile Easton. The study, now complete, is included in an environmental impact study of the road, but tolling is not something UDOT is pushing for, Easton said. It's basically a concept that's been on the shelf for more than a year that will ultimately be decided by the Legislature.

"We're completely neutral on tolling," Easton said. "We were asked to study it, and we did. Really, our role in tolling is done. Whether it's a toll road will be decided by the Legislature."

Recent comments

I, for one, will not use the highway if it is a toll road.

No toll road | July 7, 2008 at 9:23 p.m.

Equitable? Is it equitable for someone in San Juan County to pay for...

Bert | July 7, 2008 at 9:43 a.m.

I am proud of these cities for taking a stand. A toll road would be...

No toll roads please | July 7, 2008 at 9:42 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

NO MASS EXPENSIVE DEPORTATION IS NEEDED? E-VERIFY IS VASTLY BECOMING THE...

I believe this, and the next few, will be among the best Y hoops years ever....

Students protest animal testing

How about testing the brain power of the owners who have animals which end up...

I'm a stoked to watch RSL tear these clowns to pieces. BOOYAH!

Boozer is doing great and some people are talking about trading him. He is a...

The US may be number one in gun violence but think how much worse it would be...

"Only that Mendenhall tapped into an important component of his team for the...

Utes turn attention to rivalry

I have been to a couple Utah-BYU games in Provo. Both times, I was subjected...

Are you a little confused today John? First...divorced men being compared to...

Re: Give it a rest Who do you call if you have an emergency on Sunday?

Advertisements