From Deseret News archives:

West-side cities re-emphasizing opposition to toll for new road

Published: Monday, July 7, 2008 12:09 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
It's been a little more than a year since Salt Lake County's west-side cities started rallying against the idea that toll charges could be a way to pay for the Mountain View Corridor.

But several west-side cities are starting to re-emphasize their opposition to tolling by passing resolutions against that possibility in the hopes that it will be taken off the table once and for all.

"A year ago, basically, Utah's Department of Transportation said the tolling issue was dead," said West Jordan Mayor Dave Newton. "Then all of a sudden it started popping up again. The response of the cities is, 'Wait a minute, we had better make sure everyone understands our position.' We thought the issue had gone away, but apparently, it hasn't."

West Jordan passed a resolution in February 2007 encouraging the Legislature and UDOT to consider funding options other than tolling. Bluffdale, South Jordan and West Valley City signed similar resolutions at that time.

West Valley signed another resolution last week to reiterate its position that tolling is the "least desirable option" for funding the $2 billion-plus, 44-mile highway that is planned to stretch from I-80 in western Salt Lake County to northern Utah County. Taylorsville also recently discussed the resolution.

Story continues below
Other options to fund the road could include an increased gas tax, increased registration fees or increased costs for auto services, West Valley City Councilman Mike Winder said. None of those is desirable, but any one of them would share the burden, Winder said.

"I think it would be more beneficial to say, 'What's the lesser of the evils here?' because none of those are likable funding mechanisms," Winder said. "I would argue that as despised as increases in gas tax or registration fees are, those would be more equitable to everyone for the road, because then everyone in the state would share it, rather than just those on the west side."

UDOT studied tolling as a funding option at the request of the state Legislature, said UDOT spokesman Nile Easton. The study, now complete, is included in an environmental impact study of the road, but tolling is not something UDOT is pushing for, Easton said. It's basically a concept that's been on the shelf for more than a year that will ultimately be decided by the Legislature.

"We're completely neutral on tolling," Easton said. "We were asked to study it, and we did. Really, our role in tolling is done. Whether it's a toll road will be decided by the Legislature."

Recent comments

I, for one, will not use the highway if it is a toll road.

No toll road | July 7, 2008 at 9:23 p.m.

Equitable? Is it equitable for someone in San Juan County to pay for...

Bert | July 7, 2008 at 9:43 a.m.

I am proud of these cities for taking a stand. A toll road would be...

No toll roads please | July 7, 2008 at 9:42 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Cont: 7. Get federal regulation and a over burdensome IRS out of small...

I like that you used the phrase, "pressure turned so low," as if there is...

I have to feel the LDS church agreed to approve this ordinance (which...

Mormons entering mainstream

I like that...Utah - the happiest place to live in America. It's also...

I am a HUGE Bingham supporter. The posts on here saying the "Real" 5A...

SLC council OKs gay rights policies

That's too bad. 3:32 almost made you look like a human being for a minute.

Everything is just fine, no need for any improvements to the health insurance...

For those of you who have posted your "words of wisdom" here, once against...

Editorial: Mormons and gay rights

Pagan | 3:34 p.m. You point out that you don't have to be married to get...

Letters: Trash or truth?

One mans trash is another mans treasure as the ole saying goes. To liberals -...

Advertisements
Advertisement