From Deseret News archives:

Supreme Court: Handcuffed man can't sue UHP for injuries

Published: Tuesday, July 1, 2008 1:37 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Utah Supreme Court has ruled a Salt Lake County man cannot sue the Utah Highway Patrol after he alleged a trooper allowed him to fall on his face while handcuffed.

In an unanimous ruling issued Tuesday, the justices said the troopers who arrested Thomas Peck were protected under governmental immunity from claims of negligence.

According to the ruling, two UHP troopers approached Peck at a gas station on Sept. 17, 2002 and arrested him for drunk driving. After placing him in handcuffs, the troopers told Peck to stand in front of the police cruiser while they cleared an area in the back seat to take him to jail. Peck refused to comply and shouted at the troopers.

A rain storm had just taken place before the arrest and as one trooper tried to take Peck down to the ground slowly, the trooper slipped and lost control of Peck, whose hands were cuffed behind his back. Unable to break his fall, Peck landed face-first on the ground, causing head trauma and facial injuries.

Peck sued UHP and the troopers, claiming they were negligent in allowing him to fall on his face. A district judge upheld Peck's claim, citing that an arrest must occur "in a place of legal confinement" such as a jail, in order for governmental immunity to apply.

Story continues below
However the justices say Peck's injury took place while he was in custody and there was a "causal connection" to the jail, where he was being transported. Under this ruling, the troopers are protected from the suit, the ruling states.

The high court has reversed the district court's decision and has ordered that the suit against UHP and the troopers be dismissed.


E-mail: gfattah@desnews.com

Recent comments

I was arrested by an SP in the AF back in 83 for not having my line...

jw layton | July 1, 2008 at 11:19 p.m.

"To further validate my point"...come on. This "...former high level...

bilbo | July 1, 2008 at 10:11 p.m.

re read the ruling.
1.I thought that governmental immunity...

djt | July 1, 2008 at 9:32 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

NFL locals watch

Late perhaps to catch it on newstands, but SI had an article on Peyton...

4A All-State volleyball teams

Thank you Mrs. Bailey, Mrs. White, and Mrs. Greenwood for your posts!

To "Smity | 7:45 a.m. " how well did the risk sharing work out for the...

you haven't learned yet the politics that lies in sports...at every...

Letters: It's just a game

I am just amazed at how tender hearted the Utes are. Year after year I hear...

Why is Y. ignoring spew of hatred?

Benson, Would you impose thought control rules on the BYU players. Or just...

Avoid pitfalls in clean-energy plans

What's wrong with oil? It powers cars, heats homes, creates jobs (lots of...

'I, too, have lived other places and have noticed a difference between Utah...

Just as I though, most on the critical end of the President's plan. So, to...

Sorry But it wont happen . The BCS isnt involved in anti trust so the big...

Advertisements