From Deseret News archives:

Court shoots down D.C. gun ban

But ruling is seen as not likely to affect Utah laws

Published: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:07 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
After the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a historic ruling regarding the Second Amendment right to bear arms, local legal experts say the potential legal impact in Utah has yet to be understood; specifically, how the ruling will impact the state's requirement to allow guns on university campuses.

In its first ruling on the Second Amendment since its ratification in 1791, the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling struck down the District of Columbia's ban on handguns, stating individuals do have a constitutional right to own guns. However, the flip side of the high court's majority opinion, written by Justice Antonin Scalia, states that right is not absolute and the government has a right to license and regulate firearms.

Exactly how is the big unknown.

"This is a big deal," said attorney Troy Booher with the law firm of Snell & Wilmer. Booher, a constitutional law expert, said Thursday's historic ruling is a "mixed bag" for gun rights advocates.

"We know at least that the government can regulate, but we don't know what regulations are appropriate," Booher said. "The majority opinion does say that states are allowed to require a license as long as those requirements aren't arbitrary."

The open language in Scalia's opinion was criticized by dissenting justices, who felt the ruling passed the job of working out regulatory details to the lower courts across the country.

Story continues below
A big legal question is how the ruling will impact the right to carry firearms in certain venues, such as university campuses.

For decades, the University of Utah enforced a ban on guns on campus. In 2004 the Utah Legislature passed a law that forced university officials to lift the ban. That law was upheld by the Utah Supreme Court, which ruled that the school was subject to the will of the Legislature and has to follow the law of allowing concealed weapons on state property.

"Obviously we won't know the real impact until we see how the U.S. Supreme Court's decision is treated by lower courts," said assistant Utah attorney general Brent Burnett, who represented the state in the U.'s gun ban legal fight. "The impact probably will not be significant in Utah because the individual's right to bear arms is in the state's constitution."

Burnett said the ruling is not expected to change existing gun regulations already on the books, such as age limits, limits on assault-type weapons and laws prohibiting felons from possessing guns.

Recent comments

Does this ring a bell to anyone on this subject?
"We believe that...

LDS Doctrinal Perspective | June 27, 2008 at 4:25 p.m.

Great comment! I Agree!

To "How Pathetic" | June 27, 2008 at 4:15 p.m.

Well Shazaam, I guess that Joseph Smith was wrong
for having a...

COSMO | June 27, 2008 at 3:15 p.m.

Image

Wyatt Harrison fires off a round at the gun range in Provo Canyon. The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling Thursday affirms that government can license and regulate firearms.

previousnext

Latest comments

You people who keep complaining about how Utah is mishandling this case and...

Letters: Public option needed

I don't know much about the "public option", but so long as it remains an...

It can't be said any better than that. You are right on.

Religion in politics is tiresome

"In America we have Freedom of Religion and Freedom from Religion." Yes we...

The rescuers were volunteers, so everyone using this as an argument can find...

Letters: Conservatives confused

First off, here's your first mistake, it's moving to Utah six years ago, and...

So, basically, if we want to avoid the pitfalls of Spain's wind and solar...

When you come to RES for a game bring a cell phone. I have had season...

Mr. Henderson was the spokesman in a series of recent commercials touting...

And the writer got this opinion by listening to draft dodging college...

Advertisements