From Deseret News archives:

Dixie group seeks change in 2008 lands measure

Published: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:30 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
ST. GEORGE — Two months after Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah, introduced a revised version of the Washington County Growth & Conservation Act to a Senate committee, a local citizens group wants to tweak the legislation.

"It is our position that the 2008 bill satisfies citizen priorities in some cases but not others," wrote Paul Van Dam, executive director of Citizens for Dixie's Future, in a letter addressed to Bennett and the bill's co-sponsor, Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah.

The five-page letter, sent June 11 and copied to five other senators including Nevada Sen. Harry Reid, outlines the group's concerns with several of the bill's provisions.

Van Dam said the bill would weaken protection of the Red Cliffs National Conservation Area; could allow a highway to be built through the reserve; would provide an economic incentive to sell off public lands; and might provide funding for the Lake Powell Pipeline.

"All of these provisions in the bill are in conflict with the Vision Dixie results which indicate support for protection of critical lands, scenic open space, limited public land sales and smarter growth," wrote Van Dam. "Until these provisions are modified, this bill pushes these values further out of our reach."

In the letter, Bennett and Matheson are urged to sponsor "listening sessions" in Washington County and on the Wasatch Front.

Story continues below
"All citizens are 'stakeholders' in this bill and deserve to be heard," according to the letter. "Vision Dixie is a sterling example of the democratic principle that it is best to consider all voices rather than just a few."

Representatives for Bennett and Matheson said Tuesday that public input has always been a welcome part of the process. No additional formal public meetings are scheduled.

"This latest piece of legislation is a substantially different bill than the one first submitted in 2006," said Alyson Heyrend, Matheson's communication director. "Some of the questions raised in this letter don't seem to reflect the fact that this is a very different bill."

Highlights of the legislation include adding more than 260,000 acres to the National Wilderness Preservation System; designating 165.5 miles of the Virgin River as a Wild and Scenic River; creating two National Conservation Areas in the county; selling up to 9,300 acres of public land; and designating a High Desert Off-Highway Vehicle Trail.

Bennett spokeswoman Tara Hendershott also noted that dozens of meetings with hundreds of people over the past five years brought "opposing viewpoints" to the table, which eventually produced the compromise bill.

Recent comments

why do we always have to include the wasatch front they now nothing...

gja | June 27, 2008 at 10:02 p.m.

I have tried to follow this bill as best as possible and I want to...

KG | June 26, 2008 at 8:21 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Republicans will be "upset" with anything a Democrat does. It's called...

it had been a long time problem for the jazz, at least from what i've...

Poor Rep. Matheson. Just goes to show, There is no moderation in all...

I'm just wondering who exactly Matheson thinks is going to be voting for him...

In regards to PG and LP, their top basketball players actually play...

TCU showdown has big implications

resume doesn't compare to big brother's resume against common opponents this...

I want to know why this cop was not charged with hit and run?

TCU showdown has big implications

As for the Heisman and NC wounds, unlike ewe, at least BYU was in those...

Why does there need to be a solution to a problem which does not exist? ...

How did playing at Rio Tinto and winning (wow) 1-0 help us against the Crew?...

Advertisements
Advertisement