From Deseret News archives:

West Bountiful likely to increase its water fees

Published: Sunday, June 22, 2008 12:10 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WEST BOUNTIFUL — Water fees are likely to increase for West Bountiful residents to pay for more than $20 million in water projects needed between now and when the city is built out.

But current residents aren't the only ones who will be hit with higher fees. Impact fees for new construction also are likely to increase.

The problem, says West Bountiful Mayor James Behunin, is that the city hadn't been willing to raise water fees in the past to keep up with the demands of an aging system.

Needs include storage for 400,000 gallons of water to bring the city's total to 2.5 million gallons, a well than can pump 600 gallons a minute — to bring the total to 2,100 gallons a minute — and enough infrastructure to add 74 new connections a year.

Over the next few weeks, the City Council will study various solutions, including a single bump in water rates — from $23 a month to $50 — or an increase staggered over three years.

Impact fees are currently $2,600 and could increase to $4,300.

Jason Burningham, a principal with Lewis, Young, Robertson and Burningham, the city's financial adviser, also recommended that certain water fees increase by an annual inflationary rate because construction costs will continue to increase.

Story continues below
"What we are enjoying right now are the fruits of lack of planning for decades," Behunin said.

Frustrated council members echoed his sentiments, but not only about the water situation.

Four members of the City Council are in their first terms and haven't planned a city budget before.

They're unsatisfied with the lack of detail in the budget and have requested that city staff provide justification for budget line items.

Meanwhile, Behunin has posted a copy of the proposed city budget online at wbbudget.blogspot.com so residents can inspect it and ask questions.

The city also has also been hit by the loss of and subsequent repayment of tax revenue it had been mistakenly collecting from the Holly Oil refinery for the past few years. The accounting stumble forced officials to trim $120,000 from the current budget and means the city won't be able to count on the $16,000 in monthly tax revenue generated by the glitch.

Behunin recommended hiring an assistant city administrator who can be the city's budget officer so issues such as the Holly tax debacle won't happen in the future.

Cities that are not projecting a property-tax increase are supposed to pass a final budget by today and file it with the State Auditor's Office within 30 days.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Wouldn't it be more honorable for Obama to simply decline receiving an award...

Oh, Oh, Sarah is coming to Utah, she will be in Utah, near me, Oh,...

Both BYU and USU are good teams that both have a huge home court advantage....

Letters: Paper infuriates

...says someone who probably has health insurance and a couple of SUV's with...

'Lingo' still merits discussion

This Kimball person you speak of was respectful for what woman could do for...

Response to 7:51 and 4:50 | 8:26 p.m. Dec. 8, 2009 7:51 gave a...

I bet the people who waited all night for a ticket sure feel stupid, seeing...

Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing

how many conservatives are anti-intellectual, like we need another closet...

That sophmore for Syracuse has a name. It is Brittney Martin. You will be...

yeah your right they haven't played anyone yet who do think they should play....

Advertisements