From Deseret News archives:

Districts statewide developing plans based on educator performance

Published: Thursday, June 19, 2008 12:01 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Across the state, school districts are developing their own unique plans to distribute legislative funding based on how well educators are doing their jobs.

Many of the performance-based compensation plans are a mix of elements, such as test data and teacher assessments.

Some districts have plans that emphasize teamwork and collaboration.

"We want to give teachers a carrot, to pull them together — not apart," said Robert Proffit, Washington School District professional development coordinator.

The Legislature earmarked $20 million in one-time funding for the compensation plans. The money will be doled out to districts based on enrollment.

The districts must have their plans to the state Board of Education by July 1. Many districts are frustrated with the short time allotted but say they wouldn't want to pass up the funding opportunity.

Jordan and Granite school boards approved their plans Tuesday night.

Story continues below
Granite District's plan is two-fold. First, participating teachers must create goals for themselves and their students. Money will be distributed based on achievement of these goals. Second, a school that had high participation in the goal-setting then sets three goals for itself. This can be a mix of elements, such as improving attendance, test scores and grade point average.

Jordan District's plan is comprised of 30 percent performance evaluations; 30 percent U-PASS test scores; and 40 percent Indicators of School Quality. ISQ is a survey system the district implemented last spring. Schools are rated on categories such as parent support, teacher excellence and instructional quality.

Weber and Alpine school districts are continuing to work on their plans.

Weber District's plan will be site-based and is being developed by individual schools and specific Weber district departments.

Assessments may focus on both academic and nonacademic measures. Incentives will be based on achieving or exceeding goals related to the individual school performance or district department plans. Evaluation of performance can be measured based on learning tools and instructional quality, but can also include parent, student and faculty surveys. Distinguished practices, knowledge, skill levels, student growth and advanced training also will be considered.

At Weber District, the funds will be awarded based on entire groups achieving or exceeding the goals which they have established. If performance levels aren't reached, the entire school or district department won't be eligible.

Recent comments

I wouldn't waste my time with this. I teach because of the students,...

Steve | July 28, 2008 at 10:44 a.m.

...sounds good! I could an extra tank of gas ...which is all it...

I teach | July 21, 2008 at 6:09 p.m.

THIS IS THE WORST IDEA I HAVE HEARD IN YEARS!!! turn children into...

curt | June 24, 2008 at 10:28 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

No, students are NOT safe from predators. If a parent wants to make sure...

If you really think Mormon's are mainstream, you must not have paid attention...

I don't see the schools presidents voting to get rid of WYM or NM, even...

Big games keep UHSAA coffers full

why people complain about how football is covered by the media too much. when...

A little perspective is not a bad thing. Notice the Cougar's won loss record...

I actually was encouraged by some aspects of the game. Any Utah fan who has...

A story about Mormons as minorities? In this paper? Get over the "victim"...

she was an awesome woman someone i looked up to when i was younger she was...

Relieved Cougs prep for Falcons

Wow you just made one of the dumbest comments I've heard yet. Fire Bronco????...

Photos: A Royal welcome home

Re: Huh?, You like many other haters are probably oblivious to many obvious...

Advertisements
Advertisement