From Deseret News archives:
Ruling: Some FLDS children must go back; dissent says teenage girls remain at risk
CPS will work toward 'prompt and orderly' reunification
The decision today comes after Texas RioGrande Legal Aid filed a writ of mandamus in the Third Court of Appeals on behalf of 38 mothers.
In its ruling, the high court said that state law gave the lower court broad authority to protect children "short of separating them from their parents and placing them in foster care," including removing alleged perpetrators from a child's home and preventing the removal of a child from the jurisdiction of the investigating agency.
Those options were not embraced, the court said in affirming an appellate court last week, saying Child Protective Services failed to show an immediate danger to the more than 400 children swept up from the Yearning For Zion Ranch nearly two months ago.
"On the record before us, removal of the children was not warranted," the justices said in their ruling issued in Austin, Texas.
Rod Parker, a Salt Lake City attorney acting as a spokesman for the FLDS, said today's ruling is vindication for the FLDS and called on Texas to "lay down arms."
In a statement made this afternoon, FLDS member Willie Jessop said members were emerging from a nightmare and urged the state of Texas to put the families back together. "I know that there is hope and it will be a great, great day when there are fathers and mothers hugging little children that were ripped away from them."
A spokeswoman for the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services told the Desert News their attorneys were reviewing the case.
"We are disappointed but we understand and respect the court's decision and will take immediate steps to comply," said Marleigh Meisner. "Child protective services has one purpose in this case to protect the children. Our goal is to reunite families and make sure the children will be safe. We will continue to prepare for the prompt and orderly reunification of these children with their families. We will also work with the district court to ensure the safety of the children and that all of our actions conform with the decision of the Texas Supreme Court."
Recent comments
I am amazed how people condemn out in the open polygamy (the majority...
Amazed | June 14, 2008 at 6:37 p.m.
Warren Will Pay for everything he has done that is wrong. HE HAS DONE...
Hey Grandpa Phil | June 11, 2008 at 4:38 p.m.
To: "re:rights", I agree, CPS has stretched the truth FAR too many...
Grandpa Phil | June 2, 2008 at 6:41 a.m.
- Mexican consulate in SLC dies 1:47 p.m.
- eBay fined for selling perfumes 1:46 p.m.
- Debate opens on health care bill 1:44 p.m.
- Man arrested in screwdriver assault 1:42 p.m.
- Police seek man in underwear thefts 1:42 p.m.
- 5 injured in past week near Moab 1:41 p.m.
- Beach dispute heading to high court 1:40 p.m.
- Retrial in paraplegic murder case 1:39 p.m.
- Court hears Vioxx arguments 1:38 p.m.
- High court won't hear speech suit 1:37 p.m.
- Hall mouths off about hate of Utah
888 - Cougars beat Utes in overtime
480 - Max Hall issues apology
352 - Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal
228 - BYU is champion of the state
140 - Man trapped in Nutty Putty cave dies
120 - Cave to be sealed with body inside
116 - Utes won't respond to Hall
112 - Hall reprimanded by MWC
94 - Rivalry Week is highly profane
91
I wanted to tell them not to go. I dropped subtle hints. "My money is on...
When I was a kid, I worshipped my grandpa. He was undoubtedly my hero....
Congratulations to Max and the second place MWC finish. Good Luck on the...
Please, Tina. You want a team with honor to play in your bowl. The Utes are...
Reprimand or not, the score was still 26-23. Go BYU!!!
is class on and off the field, unlike Max Hall.
POOR TENDERED FEELING HYPOCRITICAL UTES: You would be loving it if you had...
As for Max as a QB — he doesn’t seem to do well under real...
In an era of so-called political correctness and sensitivity, Hall shouldn't...
CTR .. choose to RANT .. typical BYU
I agree that sometimes animal experimentation is used too casually. But...
12:14 p.m. This wasn't a "what if" scenario. You sound oblivious to the...


