From Deseret News archives:

Rebate excludes taxpayers with foreign spouses

Published: Monday, May 12, 2008 12:04 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
There are also an estimated 1 million legal residents — immigrants with green cards — who are waiting for their spouses' paperwork to be processed, according to Paul Donnelly of Reform the Rebate, a group trying to push Congress the change the rule. The IRS doesn't keep numbers of how many of that group are cut out of the rebate because they filed jointly.

And many of the 600,000 to 800,000 highly skilled immigrants on work visas in the U.S., like Shelat, have found themselves in the same position, having married a foreigner.

"My friends, my co-workers, everyone is getting this, but not me," said Ranjeet Kumar, a software engineer who has been working in Silicon Valley for eight years.

Kumar's wife is in the U.S. legally but her status still doesn't allow her to work or apply for a Social Security number. The couple filed taxes jointly but won't qualify for the $1,200 rebate other eligible couples would get.

"I know they want to exclude illegal immigrants — but I'm not illegal, I've done exactly what I was supposed to do," Kumar said.

Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform lobbied against a version of the bill that didn't require a Social Security number for the rebate, worried about the prospect of illegal immigrants receiving checks. Spokesman Ira Mehlman said the exclusion of legal immigrants and Americans married to noncitizens was an unintended consequence.

Story continues below
"If you're serving abroad and haven't been able to file the paperwork, they should make an exception," he said. "If one spouse is a citizen, is here legally and is filing, they should probably be entitled."

Many of the couples snagged by this provision weren't aware that filing taxes using the foreign spouse's IRS-issued Taxpayer Identification Number instead of a Social Security number would cut them out. On April 14, the day before the tax deadline, the IRS clarified the situation on its Web site.

"They can file separately, though that may not necessarily be to their benefit," said Eric Smith, an IRS spokesman.

Tax advisers said even if these couples had known, frequently the financial benefits of filing jointly outweigh the maximum of $600 that the spouse with the Social Security number could get by filing separately.

But many of these couples feel they shouldn't have to choose since they've been working legally and paying taxes.

Sheila Reed, who works at Command Navy Region Europe in Naples, Italy, said she filed taxes together with her husband, who still uses the IRS Taxpayer Identification Number.

"I don't feel this is fair because I pay taxes like any other U.S. citizen," she told Stars and Stripes, a newspaper published for the U.S. military and other Department of Defense personnel. "It's not right. I have three kids."

Recent comments

Anonymous- apparently if they are married and file individually, the...

xenophobe | May 12, 2008 at 1:56 p.m.

You mean an individual file would not qualify?

Anonymous | May 12, 2008 at 12:02 p.m.

Stim- it excludes the American person as well as the foreign born...

xenophobe | May 12, 2008 at 9:42 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

The reason Winn overthrew and missed so many receivers is because he was...

Sad that this is how Hall's career will be remembered. Cougar fans can only...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

Frankly, I’m repulsed by his comments and the negative attention that...

Credit Coug defense for win

Thank you Max Hall for saying what we all could not! You spoke the truth. I...

Perhaps we can do more than just express our condolences, by contributing...

I hope that someone sits down with him and helps him understand his emotions...

What a stain Hall's mouth put on a much-needed victory. But reprimand him?...

Gotta love these excuses by Ute fans. All this talk about "wynn overthrowing...

No article I have read in the last five years sums up the entire workings of...

Thank you Max Hall for saying publicly what we all have thought and felt for...

Advertisements