FILE - In this Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2012 file photo, Israel's President Shimon Peres gives a speech during the twelfth annual Herzliya Conference in Herzliya, near Tel Aviv, Israel. Peres reached out to the Iranian people with a message of peace from the podium of Israel's parliament Wednesday, Feb. 8, 2012, as tensions between Jerusalem and Tehran continues to brew over Iran's nuclear program.
Bernat Armangue, File, Associated Press
WASHINGTON — The prospect of conflict with Iran has eclipsed Afghanistan as the key national security issue with head-spinning speed. After years of bad blood and an international impasse over Iran's disputed nuclear program, why does the threat of war seem so suddenly upon us?
The short answer is that Iran has used the years of deadlock over whether it was pursuing a bomb to get within roughly 12 months of being able to build one. Iran claims its nuclear program is not aimed at building a bomb, but it has refused to drop suspect elements of the program.
Time is running short for Iran to back down without a fight. Time is also running short for either the United States or Israel to mount a pre-emptive military strike on Iran's nuclear sites, something that seemed far-fetched until fairly recently. It is still unlikely, and for the U.S. represents the last worst option to stop an Iranian bomb.
The United States has a "very good estimate" of when Iran could produce a weapon, President Barack Obama said this week. He said that while he believes the standoff with Iran over its nuclear program can still be resolved through diplomacy, the U.S. has done extensive planning on a range of options.
"We are prepared to exercise these options should they arise," Obama said during an interview with NBC. He said Israel has not made a decision about whether to launch its own strike.
Diplomacy and economic coercion are the main focus for the U.S. and its allies, and the preferred option. But the increasingly strong warnings from Obama and other leaders reflect a global consensus that Iran is closer than ever to joining the nuclear club.
In November, the International Atomic Energy Agency issued a scathing assessment of the Iranian nuclear program, calling it disturbing and possibly dangerous. The IAEA, a U.N. body, said it had "serious concerns regarding possible military dimensions" of a program Iran claims is not intended to build a weapon.
Close U.S. ally Israel is driving much of the burst of international attention now focused on the likelihood of an Iranian bomb and what to do about it.
"When a country that refers to you as a 'cancerous tumor' is inching, however slowly, toward a nuclear weapons capability, it's understandably difficult to relax and keep quiet," said Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran exert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Nearly half of returning veterans seek...
- Impact of dam flooding to be tested
- Mitt Romney promises world's strongest...
- Studies try to find why poorer people are...
- 21,000 acres ablaze in Michigan
- Olympic hurdler Lolo Jones says she's a...
- Where did Memorial Day originate?
- Does Romney's faith concern a quarter of...
- News analysis: From confidence to...
56 - Does Romney's faith concern a quarter...
47 - Search for Mitt Romney running mate in...
35 - Olympic hurdler Lolo Jones says she's a...
31 - Can U.S. schools adopt education...
26 - Maine churches fighting gay marriage
26 - Studies try to find why poorer people...
26 - Sarah Palin catches flak over her Orrin...
24






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments