Recently there were significant victories for Utah citizens. The SOPA and PIPA bills threaten to make the Internet a darker, less free place. Fortunately for us Sen. Orrin Hatch has made a bold statement in opposition to the bill, pledging to vote no and also withdraw his co-sponsorship.
When someone who originally supported the bill (for valid reasons about protecting people from the theft of their work) comes out against it, there is a clear message sent, and that message will hopefully start a domino effect that will lead other politicians to stand against this bill.
Unfortunately this great development is being marred by the kind of people who only seek to find fault, regardless of the situation. I have already seen people on Facebook, Twitter and other online venues trashing Hatch for changing his mind, back-pedaling, flip-flopping, etc. These are the very people who have been clamoring for Hatch to take action, and now that he has done what his constituents have asked, they are upset about it.
Would they prefer he voted yes on this bill so they can continue to write negative comments? Isn't this change exactly what they hoped to accomplish? Representatives are elected to represent us, and sometimes that means changing direction to better align with the will of the people. I guess there's just no pleasing some people.
Ron Petek
Taylorsville
- My view: MMR vaccine caused my son's autism
- My view: Voting member's perspective on the...
- White House press corps has been turned into...
- Letters: Founders' values
- George F. Will: Obama takes a page from...
- John Florez: Government a big vending machine
- In our opinion: Leave NCIC alone
- My view: Fighting the ignoble reign of money
- Letters: Move to the center
37 - My view: Why moderates lost the caucus...
33 - Dan Liljenquist: IRS scandal is an...
32 - Richard Davis: Abortion laws should...
29 - Letters: Dismantle IRS
25 - Robert J. Samuelson: Can Americans stem...
21 - Letters: The buck stops here
21 - Commentary claims liberals are shocked...
21



The problem is that Hatch signed on because of lobbyists and their money, and then he found out his political calculation was wrong and the people were opposed. It is cynical politics, and we all know it.
Hatch changed his mind only because he remembered what happened to Bennett. Hatch is in preservation mode. If this wasn't an election year he would not have changed his mind.
I find it ironic that the people saying we should keep Hatch are using More..
If Mr. Hatch didn't understand the consequences of that bill when he co-sponsored it, then he should be retired. The intent of the bill is clear to anyone who reads it.
Anyone can change his mind after learning about a subject, but if the More..