Matt Gillis , Deseret News
Recent calls to change our caucus system following the ouster of Sen. Bob Bennett have me concerned, not because I have studied the system and firmly believe it to be the best around, but because of the rationale for the change.
According to Doug Wright and Mike Leavitt, our busy lifestyles and numerous other obligations make it too difficult for many to attend caucus meetings thereby losing the opportunity for our voices to be heard. However, those who have strong opinions somehow manage to schedule their lives to attend.
If the sacrifice of two hours of our time every two years is too great to be involved at the grassroots level of our government, then we deserve exactly whoever the caucus system/convention system delivers to us.
There may be a need for change. I don't know, but please let's not institute it because two hours every two years is too much to ask of the citizens of our state to be involved in the candidate selection process.
Salt Lake City
- My view: hippies, 2 Hell's Angels, one...
- Jay Evensen: On Second Thought: The 1 percent...
- Is it time for our first woman president?
- In our opinion: National security and the...
- Radon, the unrecognized killer
- Ralph Hancock: The anti-establishment delusion
- Government works best when it's not on autopilot
- H. David Burton: Calling on local leaders to...
- Is it time for our first woman president? 55
- In our opinion: National security and... 19
- Letter: Hillary and FOIA 18
- Letter: No labels in 2016? 17
- Robert J. Samuelson: The false charms... 17
- In our opinion: The lesson of... 16
- Arthur Cyr: US presidential politics... 13
- Radon, the unrecognized killer 11