Matt Gillis , Deseret News
Recent calls to change our caucus system following the ouster of Sen. Bob Bennett have me concerned, not because I have studied the system and firmly believe it to be the best around, but because of the rationale for the change.
According to Doug Wright and Mike Leavitt, our busy lifestyles and numerous other obligations make it too difficult for many to attend caucus meetings thereby losing the opportunity for our voices to be heard. However, those who have strong opinions somehow manage to schedule their lives to attend.
If the sacrifice of two hours of our time every two years is too great to be involved at the grassroots level of our government, then we deserve exactly whoever the caucus system/convention system delivers to us.
There may be a need for change. I don't know, but please let's not institute it because two hours every two years is too much to ask of the citizens of our state to be involved in the candidate selection process.
Salt Lake City
- Can you pass the U.S. citizenship test?
- W. Bradford Wilcox: The new progressive...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Are...
- 19 songs to consider as replacements for the...
- My view: Utah, where do you stand on marriage?
- Charles Krauthammer: The jihadi logic
- James Gattuso: Give Tesla a truly free market...
- Drew Clark: The 'least dangerous branch' must...
- My view: Utah, where do you stand on... 95
- Letter: Bush dilemma 2.0 37
- George F. Will: Obama needs Congress to... 27
- In our opinion: How committed are... 25
- W. Bradford Wilcox: The new progressive... 20
- My view: Intergenerational poverty the... 19
- Can you pass the U.S. citizenship test? 19
- In our opinion: Now a thriving urban... 17