The Doomsday Clock, created in 1947, reflects the global failures to solve the problems posed by nuclear weapons and the climate crisis. The clock has been adjusted another minute to five minutes to 12:00 midnight.
Associated Press
It's 11:55 p.m. on the Doomsday Clock; do you know where your children are?
Actually, it doesn't matter. The clock never will hit midnight because, if it did, there wouldn't be any human hands around to reset it, much less any children or parents to worry about.
But let's not jump that far ahead. We have enough trouble figuring out what to do with daylight saving time, let alone worry about how a group of scientists arbitrarily sets a make-believe clock to scare the world into enacting treaties that, history affirms, will not keep tyrants from tyrannizing or dictators from dictating.
What we ought to worry about are our own doomsday clocks, which seem to be set about as haphazardly as toys on the floor of a 2-year-old's playroom and which, let's be honest, could go off at any moment.
The boards of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which includes 18 Nobel laureates, decided to move the world's big hypothetical clock ahead a minute last week, to five minutes of annihilation, because the leaders of the world have failed to ratify the Comprehensive Test ban Treaty, have made no progress toward stopping production of nuclear weapons material and haven't kept Iran from working on a bomb. Also, a lack of progress on global warming and questions surrounding the Fukushima nuclear reactor disaster helped them decide it was getting later.
I'm venturing to guess we're not all synchronizing our watches. You have different lists. I know this because my inbox fills up with them daily.
For some, the clock is close to midnight because of a president they believe has a secret agenda to destroy the nation.
For others, it ticks away because they believe Republicans would reward the rich and destroy social programs.
Some think the clock is running out because illegal immigrants are, as they see it, overrunning the land and robbing its resources. For others it is running because those immigrants are being persecuted, their families yanked apart.
Others see doomsday lurking even amid signs of economic recovery. Unemployment may be down, but Europe is teetering like an old skyscraper filled with demolition dynamite. If it goes, we go with it.
Pick your pet issue and set your clock accordingly. Is it terrorism or the advance of radical ideologies? How about the degradation of popular media and the coarsening of society? Is it an education system that fails to adequately prepare the next generation?
- Robert J. Samuelson: Rethink the notion that...
- Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
- Robert Bennett: How I came to write a weekly...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- It's déjà vu all over again with...
- In our opinion: Editorial: Underwater...
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- Would repossessing federal lands help fund...
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - It's déjà vu all over again...
33 - Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
29 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
21 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
19 - Would repossessing federal lands help...
18 - Letter: Citizens must overlook emotions...
17 - Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
13






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments