Laura Seitz, Deseret News
On a typical weekday, Rena Lakai gets up early and goes to work as a caregiver in Salt Lake, showing up at about 9 a.m. at the homes of her elderly clients, making them food, doing their laundry and then sitting and talking with them until about noon, when her job is done.
Lakai's mind is never far from her family, and each morning as she goes about the duties of her job, she can imagine life on Vava'u, an island in the South Pacific part of the Kingdom of Tonga. If she closes her eyes, she can even smell the rich fragrance of dirt that six of her siblings till every year to farm kava, which is used in a popular drink.
The tiny island nation is beset with poverty, which is why Lakai's six siblings have taken in eight children to feed, clothe and put through school, along with their own. They often ask Lakai help to pay the bills. And so every month, she goes to a nearby Walmart and wires a Moneygram — about $500 a month — to Tonga. On the rural island it takes one of her siblings about an hour and a half to get to the nearest Tonga Development Bank where they can withdraw the cash.
This scenario plays out every day throughout Utah and across the United States, especially in areas with large immigrant populations. It's an important, but often unrecognized, part of the family support structure in many developing countries. It is also an often-overlooked way in which the United States contributes to the developing world.
While the U.S. spends only 0.21 percent of its Gross National Income on official development aid, nearly twice that amount, more than $50 billion, leaves the country in remittances. The U.S. leads the world in remittances — transferring nearly twice the amount abroad than the runner-up, Saudi Arabia. Total world official development aid, $128.7 billion in 2010, pales in comparison to the $325 billion in remittances that go to developing parts of the world. And because of technology, transparency in pricing and competition, sending remittances abroad is getting cheaper.
Lakai is typical of those recently immigrated Americans who send money to family in their ancestral homelands. The oldest of 12, and born in American Samoa, Lakai has lived in Utah for about two years with her parents, a brother and sister and aunts and uncles.
She is part of the more than half of Tonga's population that lives abroad, mainly in nearby Australia and New Zealand as well as the United States. One in four Tongans live in Utah.
Her family's reliance on her work in the U.S. is the norm for many on the island. According to the Migration Policy Institute, a non-profit think tank in Washington D.C., remittances are 30 percent of Tonga's GDP.
Easier to send money
Neil Hamlin is the managing director of Money Move It, a New Zealand company that facilitates online money transfers to more than 30 countries, including Tonga. "We believe you should be able to send money anywhere, any time, for pretty much nothing, and that's what we are working towards. The reason that we exist is because banks were drastically overcharging."
Today, it can cost $10 to $15 to simply do a bank transfer, when only a few years ago it cost around $25.
But sending money to Tonga from Australia or New Zealand using Money Move It is even cheaper — less than $1. The money can be picked up instantly at a Tonga Development Bank, which has branches located around the country, or transferred to a bank account in a couple of days.
Jonathan Capal is the Australian regional manager of Developing Markets Associates Limited (DMA), and has created the site Send Money Pacific, which enables people to compare prices of sending money to the Pacific islands.
Capal thinks that the increased competition and transparency for migrants is upsetting established banks, causing them to slash fees because of competition.
Send Money Pacific reports that between January 2009 and July 2011, costs to send money to the Pacific islands from Australia have fallen by 6.3 percent and from New Zealand by 3.8 percent. In some cases they have seen dramatic drops in money transfer operator costs — Australia-to-Fiji costs have gone from 18 percent to 7 percent.
Online sites such as Kick Ex and Money Move It have provided simple pages with clear directions and low prices for people to transfer money.
Two of the biggest mobile companies in the pacific, Digicel and Vodafone, have launched a "wallet service" enabling those covered by a participating network to receive money transferred abroad instantly to their cell phone. Those on the islands can withdraw cash from a street kiosk or even pay bills using their cellphone.
It's not only more convenient, it's also safer. Cellphones leave an electronic trail for everything and transfers are reported to authorities.
Obstacles to giving
Lakai's brothers and sisters in Tonga are lucky in a way. With the downturn in the economy, many migrant workers in the United States have had trouble finding the spare funds to send back to their family.
Sione Kivalu, who lives in Salt Lake and has done concrete work for the last 10 years, came to the United States from Tonga in 1994. He married in Hawaii and after a cousin told him it was a good place to raise a family, moved to Utah with his 2-year-old daughter.
In the past, his sister or brother still in Tonga would ask for help to pay for their children's schooling, various bills, or a funeral.
"I would send whatever was left over after taking care of my children here," Sione says. "It was usually around $100 once or twice a year.
He now has two girls and two boys ranging from ages 8 to 15.
"I have not been able to send anything in the last two years," Kivalu said. "We are struggling here."
In 2008, remitted funds from the United States were at a high of around $54.4 billion. But by 2010 they had dropped below $52 billion.
Immigration slowed with the economy as well, providing fewer workers to help their families abroad. The Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development estimated that 2009 saw a net increase of 2 percent in legal immigration, down in the United States from 5 percent a year earlier. Illegal immigration has dropped off, too. The Pew Hispanic Center reported 300,000 annually came to the U.S. illegally from 2007 to 2009, compared to 850,000 between 2000 and 2005.
Barriers to sending cash
From anti-money laundering laws to the Patriot Act, barriers in the United States keep the price of sending money to families abroad high. For Tongans in the United States, the low-cost money transfer website Money Move It is unavailable. Hamlin says that when his company researched operating in the United States, they decided the rules and regulations were too formidable a barrier.
"Regulations have made it harder and harder for my company, but not for the banks," Hamlin says.
"Ironically, the biggest barrier to immigrants using remittances could come from looming regulations intended to help them," says John Berlau, director of the Center for Investors and Entrepreneurs at the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
"The Dodd-Frank financial overhaul of 2010 imposes multilingual mandates for providers of remittances," Berlau said. "The forms must be in the language of the community. These costs could be astronomical in neighborhoods where many languages and dialects are spoken. So the unintended consequence may very well be less outlets that serve immigrant communities with remittances, driving up consumer costs and limiting choices."
Alex Nowrasteh, at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, says things like ID requirements and background checks can be quite burdensome for migrants.
Efficient foreign aid
Lowering costs for sending remittances encourages a very efficient and voluntary form of foreign aid, experts said.
"The benefit of remittances compared to foreign aid and some charity is that it goes directly to the person for whom it is intended — there is no intervening authority involved, no government agency, no implementing organization — just resources from one person being directed to another person who has a need," says Karol Boudreaux, Africa Land Tenure Specialist at USAID.
Also, cash can be used on anything the receiver sees fit.
"Aid projects may do good on the ground," she said, "and may reflect what beneficiaries want and need (for example, an aid project that provides for clean water or better sanitation services may meet the needs of local communities and reflect their preferences), but sometimes these projects reflect what agencies determine is best and may not reflect what households truly want."
"Immigration is a huge net benefit for Utah," Nowrasteh said. "And remittances can come back to the U.S. in form of investment or trade.
"It is a great way for poor people in poor countries to build capital, save and spend on education, so in the future they won't need to send migrants."
- Community comes together to surprise...
- Man killed in avalanche had a passion for...
- 'We're not going to stop'
- About Utah: Company helps show 'you don't win...
- Photos: Olympian Noelle Pikus-Pace speaks to...
- Behind the masks: Why some Utahns choose...
- No money for House Speaker Becky Lockhart's...
- Family of BYU student hit by car say they are...
- Utah Democrats offer full Medicaid... 34
- Gov. Herbert threatens veto of House... 31
- Judge: Biological father will share... 28
- The story of a fish, a river and what's... 24
- Local religious leaders urge support... 24
- Cities, state battle panhandling... 22
- Utah unemployment rate hits five-year low 18
- Dog lovers walk to support anti-bias... 12