Microsoft co-founder and chairman Bill Gates leaves the Frank E. Moss federal courthouse in Salt Lake City, Monday, Nov. 21, 2011. Gates testified in a $1 billion antitrust lawsuit brought by Novell Inc.
Jim Urquhart, Associated Press
SALT LAKE CITY — Microsoft's Bill Gates insisted that changes to Windows 95 that undermined a rival word processor were meant to protect the Windows operating system from crashing and not to hurt a competitor.
Gates completed a second day of testimony Tuesday defending his company against a $1 billion antitrust lawsuit filed by Novell Inc. The Utah-based company claims Microsoft Corp. enticed it to work on a new version of the WordPerfect writing program only to withdraw support months before Windows 95 was released.
Gates said he had no idea his decision to drop a tool for outside developers would sidetrack Novell and that the company never complained. WordPerfect's market share rapidly declined to less than 10 percent from nearly 50 percent as Microsoft's own office programs took hold.
"Whether or not our products get market share — that was completely up to the market," said Gates, who argued Novell could have worked around the problem but failed to react quickly.
Microsoft, he said, was under no obligation to help Novell, a wholly owned subsidiary of The Attachmate Group as a result of a merger earlier this year.
Novell said it was forced to sell WordPerfect for a $1.2 billion loss. It sued Redmond, Wash.-based Microsoft in 2004, claiming Gates ordered engineers to withdraw support for WordPerfect because he feared it was too good.
On Tuesday, Gates shot back that Word was "far superior" to WordPerfect, which was a "bulky, slow, buggy product" that did not integrate well with Windows 95. Gates said his engineers warned it threatened the reliability of future Windows versions.
For hours Tuesday, Gates sparred with Novell's trial attorney over software terms as jury members yawned in boredom.
"He's not an easy witness," said Novell attorney Jeffrey Johnson.
Gates insisted there was no viable alternative to the Windows operating system in the market at the time, which would mean Novell does not have an antitrust case.
Other systems lacked enough applications to be a "reasonable choice in the marketplace," he said.
Gates testified that Microsoft was racing to put out a new generation of Windows when he dropped a tool Novell said it needed to piggyback on the Windows 95 juggernaut. While some executives opposed his decision — Microsoft traditionally gave the keys to outside developers — other company developers warned it threatened the stability of new Windows technology.
- The price of freedom: Nearly half of...
- Mitt Romney promises world's strongest...
- Mitt Romney ready to claim GOP nomination...
- Impact of dam flooding to be tested
- New approach tested for high blood pressure
- Glenn Beck: Living large in Texas, and richer...
- Studies try to find why poorer people are...
- Olympic hurdler Lolo Jones says she's a...
- News analysis: From confidence to...
56 - Does Romney's faith concern a quarter...
47 - Olympic hurdler Lolo Jones says she's a...
31 - Studies try to find why poorer people...
27 - Can U.S. schools adopt education...
26 - Maine churches fighting gay marriage
26 - Sarah Palin catches flak over her Orrin...
24 - The price of freedom: Nearly half of...
21






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments