Khalil Hamra, Associated Press
CAIRO — Tens of thousands of Islamists and young activists have massed in Tahrir Square, confronting Egypt's ruling military council with the largest crowd in months to protest the generals' attempt to give themselves special powers over a future elected government.
While united against the army, however, conservatives and liberals were jockeying among themselves for votes in crucial parliamentary elections only 10 days away.
The stakes are higher for all sides than at any time since the uprising ousted President Hosni Mubarak in February. The victors will help choose who will draft a new constitution, thus defining the character of post-revolutionary Egypt.
Most of this year's rallies in Tahrir Square since Mubarak's ouster have been led by liberal- or left-leaning groups, but Islamists dominated Friday's protest. Members of the Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt's best-organized group, carried signs and waved flags bearing the logo of its Freedom and Justice party. Elsewhere, ultraconservative Salafis in long robes and bushy beards called for application of Islamic Sharia law.
For most of the day, liberal groups showed little organized presence.
The mobilization by the Brotherhood, which had until recently avoided confrontation with the ruling Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, reflects a shift in the group's position. It has threatened to escalate its protest campaign if plans to give permanent political powers to the military are not scrapped.
"The army has no role in ruling people," said Hani Hegazi, who came by bus from outside Cairo with other Brotherhood members. "Its only job is to protect the country. We want civilian rule chosen through democracy."
Other protesters carried banners reading "Down with military rule. Egypt our country is not a military camp." Many had Egyptian flags, while some religious conservatives waved flags calling the Quran, Islam's holy book, "our constitution."
The rally's primary target was a document floated by the government that declares the military to be the guardian of "constitutional legitimacy," suggesting it would have the final word on major policies, and possibly legislation, even after a new president is elected.
The document, meant to spell out guiding principles for the new constitution, would shield the military and its budget from civilian oversight. An early version of it also said the military would appoint 80 members of the 100-person constitutional committee — a move that would vastly diminish the new parliament's role.
Groups across the political spectrum rejected the document, calling it an attempt by the military to perpetuate its rule past the post-Mubarak transition period. The Brotherhood has said the document "reinforces dictatorship," and last-minute negotiations between the government and the Brotherhood failed to break the impasse.
"All of us are scared that the army could try to hold on to power," said Walid Farouq, 32, who wore the long beard and traditional robe of ultraconservative Muslims. "It is time for a civilian government."
Anger has been building against the generals, whom many accuse of using Mubarak-era tactics to crack down on critics, failing to reform the security forces and monopolizing decision-making. Many fear the generals will seek to retain their power — a claim they deny.
The military originally promised to transfer power to an elected civilian government within six months of Mubarak's ouster. But a vague, new timetable suggests that presidential elections won't be held until 2013. Specific dates have only been set for parliamentary balloting, set to begin Nov. 28 and drag into March.
Field Marshal Hussein Tantawi, Egypt's military ruler, fueled speculation he might seek the presidency when he strolled through downtown Cairo in September in civilian attire, shaking hands and patting shoulders. The military has denied it has any intention of staying in power or fielding its own candidate in a presidential election.
- The brave man who may have risked his life in...
- The new face of extreme poverty in America
- Bill Plaschke: Pat Haden, USC shouldn’t...
- More cities are recognizing Native Americans...
- A tale of two cities: Norwegian towns offer...
- Walking where Columbus walked: Local man...
- Obama: Clinton made mistake; security not...
- Jobs, gov't distrust central to national park...
- Is 'Speaker Chaffetz' more likely with... 70
- More cities are recognizing Native... 23
- Gun violence researchers becoming an... 18
- Obama: Clinton made mistake; security... 18
- The new face of extreme poverty in America 18
- Obama touts immigration reform in... 17
- Rep. Jason Chaffetz says he wouldn't... 15
- Obama: Americans must 'come together'... 14