Thursday will mark Mitt Romney's first visit to Iowa since August. According to his spokesperson, Andrea Saul, the candidate will visit Iowa several more times before the Jan. 3 election. The visits may signal a change in strategy for the Romney campaign, which so far has adopted a long and lean approach to the race in the Hawkeye state.
Now that just 2 percentage points separate Romney from Iowa frontrunner Herman Cain, supporters argue that Mitt should make a play for Iowa. In an interview with MSNBC News, Doug Gross, Romney 2008 state chair said, "He could come out here and campaign aggressively and win in Iowa, beat all expectations, and frankly I think put it all away in the first state."
Gross added, "When you have an unformed field with multiple social conservatives in the race, with a lot of mainstream Republicans and independents looking for that person that can beat Obama and give voice to economic concerns, he is the perfect candidate."
However, at least one political observer cautions that a win in Iowa could create problems for Romney in New Hampshire. Jim Geraghty of the National Review noted, "A review of the recent history of presidential nomination contests suggests that the purpose of the New Hampshire contest is to negate the result of the Iowa contest."
Since 1980, every GOP candidate who took Iowa lost in the Granite State. Geraghty speculates that this correlation follows from the desire of New Hampshire voters to ensure that the presidential race is not decided by the first caucuses in Iowa. Another explanation for this trend is that candidates who commit to winning in Iowa are unable to devote the time and resources necessary to compete with candidates who focus on New Hampshire.
According to Geraghty, if Romney takes Iowa then New Hampshire voters could transfer their support to Jon Huntsman, who has spent considerable time campaigning in the state. From there, South Carolina may rally around the leading non-Mormon candidate, most likely Cain or Gingrich. In this scenario, voters in subsequent states would go to the polls faced with a wide-open field.
EMAIL: mwhite@desnews.com
- How colleges take from the poor, give to the...
- Mothers on meth: New book highlights family...
- Defending the Faith: A case for the...
- Affordable Care Act could bring 'skinny'...
- Tornado victims include animal lover, man in...
- Gallup poll shows shift in views on morality...
- Wash. I-5 bridge collapse caused by oversize...
- Boy Scouts open membership to all boys,...
- Defending the Faith: A case for the...
64 - Boy Scouts open membership to all boys,...
48 - IRS official Lerner invokes Fifth...
22 - Former IRS chief to Congress: Can't say...
21 - Gallup poll shows shift in views on...
21 - US companies challenging contraception...
20 - IRS role in Obamacare adds deeper layer...
16 - Fire chief says search almost complete...
15



I hate to think that New Hampshire voters are really so shallow that they would not vote for a candidate just because Iowa voters did vote for him. Really?
Thank you David King for mentioning some context.
I understand why the Deseret News is so over-the-top with their "all-Romney, all-the-time" coverage and even why they so often skip the rest of the field and jump right to More..
Deal breakers with Romney:
Pro-torture and enhanced interrogation techniques. I find it very surprising that so many LDS members teach loving your enemy and doing good to them that hate you, yet turn a blind eye to the horrendous things More..