State issues can be tricky for presidential field

By Dan Sewell

Associated Press

Published: Thursday, Oct. 27 2011 2:12 p.m. MDT

In this Oct. 25, 2011, photo, Republican presidential candidate former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, center, talks with workers during a visit to a GOP phone bank in Terrace Park, Ohio. Romney had gingerly distanced himself from a labor issue on the Ohio ballot on Tuesday. On Wednesday, he embraced the initiative "110 percent." The reversal not only highlights his record of equivocations but also underscores the local political minefields national candidates often confront in their state-by-state path to the presidency.

Al Behrman, Associated Press

Enlarge photo»

CINCINNATI — Mitt Romney gingerly distanced himself from a labor issue on the Ohio ballot one day. The next, he embraced the initiative "110 percent."

The equivocation not only highlighted his record of shifting positions but also underscored the local political minefields national candidates often confront in their state-by-state path to the presidency.

Candidates visiting Nevada often wade into the debate about where nuclear waste should go. They're pressed in South Carolina to take a stand on an aircraft maker's labor dispute. In New Hampshire, they face questions about right-to-work issues. And then there are the perennials, such as ethanol subsidies in Iowa and the Confederate battle flag in South Carolina.

Such local issues aren't of concern to most voters across the nation, but these topics can matter greatly to voters wanting to hear the thoughts of candidates soliciting support ahead of presidential primaries. Candidates often work to strike a balance between addressing issues local voters care about without staking out hardline positions that could hurt them elsewhere.

"They've got to be careful about not weighing in on issues that are exclusively local. That could backfire," said Kevin Smith, a conservative activist and likely Republican gubernatorial candidate in New Hampshire. "It's something that could easily be blown up into something bigger than it ought to be."

As Romney proved this week, such local issues can trip up even the most cautious candidate, causing headaches for their national campaigns while hurting their standings in important states for both the primary and general elections.

"Fully support that," Romney said about the Ohio ballot initiative while visiting a local Republican Party office Wednesday in Fairfax, Va.

A day earlier, the former Massachusetts governor visited a site near Cincinnati where volunteers were making hundreds of phone calls to help Republicans defeat the Issue Two ballot effort. The question before voters is whether to repeal Ohio Gov. John Kasich's restrictions on public sector employee bargaining. But when pressed, Romney took a pass on supporting the measure — and just as a Quinnipiac University poll indicated that Ohio voters opposed the GOP-backed restrictions 57 percent to 32 percent.

It turned out that Romney had already weighed in, supporting Kasich's efforts in a June Facebook post.

Republican and Democratic critics alike were quick to point out Romney's waffling. His campaign rivals Rick Perry and Jon Huntsman fired off statements supporting the union restrictions, and President Barack Obama's Ohio state campaign director, Greg Schultz, sent out emails Tuesday night to supporters noting Romney's "sidestep."

Roughly 24 hours later, Romney clarified his support for Kasich.

Some observers questioned whether Romney's response had less to do with the GOP primary, which Ohio will hold well after the early voting states, and more to do with the general election and the need to woo independent voters.

On the other hand, Romney may lose the party loyalists he needs to get the GOP nomination by waffling on the matter.

"The people who would be paying the most attention to this are probably the base of the Republican Party, and that's why it has the potential to be most damaging to him," said veteran Ohio political scientist Gene Beaupre of Xavier University.

At one time, presidential candidates visiting Iowa would stumble over that state's pet issue: federal subsidies for ethanol, the fuel additive the state leads in producing. But the issue has faded as a litmus test in the years since Bob Dole, a strong advocate, won the Iowa caucuses while opponent Phil Gramm of Texas finished a disappointing fifth.

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS