President Obama's jobs bill was sent to Congress with a threat to pass it or prepare to be run "out of town." Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called that bluff with a motion to force a vote on Obama's original jobs package. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., last night triggered a rarely used, and previously denounced, procedure called the "nuclear option" to change Senate rules to prevent Republicans from forcing votes on the president's jobs bill. Why?
Because Reid, McConnell, Democrats and Republicans alike know the president's jobs package will fail. Beneath their political facade, they know that spending more taxpayer money will not create the jobs that the billions of stimulus dollars before it failed to produce. They see it for what it is; a faux offer to be rejected and used to launch Obama's presidential campaign because he has no record to run on.
Gary Petersen
Layton
- My view: UDOT listened, made a good choice
- Letters: Move to the center
- Richard Davis: Abortion laws should keep up...
- Letters: No welfare, ever
- In our opinion: Susan Cox Powell's case is...
- Timothy R. Clark: Real job creation requires...
- Comprehensive immigration reform or bust
- Letters: Disaster vs. disease
- Letters: No welfare, ever
73 - My view: Why moderates lost the caucus...
33 - Letters: Move to the center
31 - Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
31 - In our opinion: Big screen exploitation...
27 - Richard Davis: Abortion laws should...
26 - Robert J. Samuelson: Can Americans stem...
21 - Letters: The buck stops here
18



Mr. Peterson should be honest in his assessment about Harry Reid's actions. It was not "to prevent Republicans from forcing votes on the president's jobs bill." It was to allow debate on the bill before the vote, which is exactly what More..
Has the campaign started? This letter leads us to that conclusion. The jobs bill actions in the Senate are high level political posturing, and I am betting the writer of this letter really has no clue as top what is going on. Instead, he uses More..