The Constitution isn't broken, Congress is. No balanced budget amendment, if implemented, would be constructive. A simple majority in the House alone, through its control of the purse, can, with sufficient will, bring the federal government under control.
That's where Rep. Rob Bishop, Rep. Jim Matheson and Rep. Jason Chaffetz come in. This country will not survive unless the House restricts spending. They have the Constitutional power to do so.
They can do it without a balanced budget amendment too. It's easy to conclude that the new rash of balanced budget amendment proposals are just political posturing by those seeking business as usual. For those who consider themselves conservatives to demand it puts the entire Constitutional structure at risk. If an allegedly popular demand for a balanced budget amendment is created and Congress resists, then the "evil hidden forces" in Washington will orchestrate pressure on the state Legislatures for an Article V convention.
Heaven help us all if that happens. The Constitution as we know it today will be formally changed. We should tell our House members to just vote for the Constitution.
- In our opinion: Brexit and the U.K.'s new...
- In our opinion: US v. Texas and immigration...
- On Second Thought: Departugal, Italeave and...
- In our opinion: California considering bold...
- John Florez: If elephants can dance so can...
- Letter: Come together
- Letter: Reducing teacher load
- Charles Krauthammer: Hillaryism: Tired...
- Letter: Shooter's motives 36
- Letter: Carbon emissions fee 30
- In our opinion: California considering... 29
- In our opinion: US v. Texas and... 22
- My view: Taxpayers should call foul on... 19
- In our opinion: Brexit and the U.K.'s... 18
- Charles Krauthammer: Hillaryism: Tired... 17
- Letter: Panhandlers in Sandy 17