As a student who does not go to seminary, I thought the recent article, "Canyons won't sell land for seminary, but will still allow release time" (Aug. 17), was a very interesting piece. I think that the school district did the right thing by not favoring either religion over the other. I know that this will make it hard for LDS students who want to take seminary, and I hope it will work out in the end.
Kelsey Messick
Provo
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running shoe...
- Timothy R. Clark: Graduation advice for my...
- Snapshot of 2013 in political cartoons
- Letters: Threats justified
- My view: Nothing sinister about Common Core
- State pensions threaten to bleed states dry
- In our opinion: A darkening cloud is hanging...
- In our opinion: New leader in Iran, but...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- Letters: Stop the witch hunt
35 - John Florez: Show leadership on...
31 - Supreme Court, Congress, citizens: The...
27 - Letter: Media failure
25 - Robert Bennett: Sticking to facts is...
23 - Letters: Threats justified
23 - In our opinion: Limit the power of the...
18 - Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running...
17



Thanks Kelsey for your interest in a school district so far from your home. Given the need for revenues that the Canyon's district has stated it needs, it seems holding land that has value for no other purpose than to not appear to favor one or More..
I agree - put the land up for bid (qualified bidders only). If Summum wins the bid and wants to spend its resources building a place of religious instruction near the school, that will be that much less money they will have to invest in frivolous More..
jon w
I think Barnard would take it pro-bono.
So what if it's more dangerous for the LDS kids to get to seminary.