Like Vivian Talbot ("Power of Compromise," Readers' Forum, Aug. 16), I was surprised by a recent letter in the paper ("No Moderates," Readers' Forum, Aug. 9). I was tempted to respond but then decided it must have been a tongue-in-cheek submission, since surely no one seriously thinks that compromise would have doomed the Constitution when, in fact, compromise is what made it possible.
But if the author really meant it, then, right on Vivian, for explaining the truth of the matter. I, too, was disappointed in our GOP members in Congress over their votes on the debt crisis. Is it legally possible for Rep. Jim Matheson to represent the entire state?
My kudos also to Lee Farnsworth ("Moderate Voices," Aug. 4); Don Cunningham ("We need Moderates," Aug. 6); Bruce Christiansen ("Ideological intransigence," Aug. 7); Max Parkin ("Wisdom in diplomacy," Aug. 8); thank goodness we're getting some great letters.
I can almost sympathize with Rocky Anderson when he announced he's through with the Democrats because if the no-compromise tea party gains control, I'm through with the Republicans.
- Doug Robinson: The first kiss and the long...
- In our opinion: An immigration opportunity
- Doug Robinson: Basketball needs a new, less...
- Jay Evensen: Why some mothers kill babies:...
- Letter: Socialism, like salt
- About Utah: Biggest weekend of the year at...
- Drew Clark: Meaning of 'thou shalt not kill'...
- Letter: Disagreement vs. hate
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Why the... 57
- In our opinion: The Ten Commandments in... 52
- Charles Krauthammer: Defend the... 52
- Letter: Socialism, like salt 45
- Robert Bennett: Making our own spending... 40
- In our opinion: An immigration opportunity 35
- Letter: Disagreement vs. hate 34
- Robert J. Samuelson: Long-term... 26