BOSTON — The Mormonism of presidential candidates Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman Jr. was discussed in depth in this morning's Boston Globe.
Globe staff writer Lisa Wangsness draws from a variety of sources to contrast what she called Romney's "highly active and orthodox" membership in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints with what she characterized as Huntsman's religious "ambivalence" and "ambiguity." Although neither candidate was willing to be interviewed for her article, Wangsness writes that the apparent differences "highlights a growing debate about whether this relatively new religion can accommodate a more classic definition of what it means to be Mormon."
The article makes it clear that "Huntsman does not appear to be estranged from the church. Friends and associates say that before he became ambassador to China, he often attended services at his local ward, or congregation, in Salt Lake City. And U.S. Representative Jason Chaffetz of Utah, Huntman's former chief of staff, said that during his first gubernatorial run, Huntsman taught a class to prepare young men for the lay priesthood."
Others have said contrasts between Romney's and Huntsman's statements on their faith show "some of the diversity within the LDS tradition, making people less likely to assume all Mormons must fit the Mitt Romney mold," as Rachel Esplin Odell wrote last month in a "My View" guest editorial for the Deseret News,
Odell is a foreign policy researcher at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and past president of the Harvard College Latter-day Saint Student Association. "In fact," she added, "(Huntsman's) bio would jibe well on the new mormon.org: "I played in a rock band. I ride a Harley. I'm a Mormon."
The Globe's Wangsness interviewed Elder L. Whitney Clayton of the LDS Church's First Quorum of the Seventy. While he was not specifically speaking of Huntsman or Romney, he indicated the "strength of religious conviction among individual Mormons varies . . . those who are active tend to be firmly grounded in the faith."
The article says it is "unclear" how Huntsman's "less-orthodox Mormonism" will play politically, although David Woodard, a political scientist at Clemson University in South Carolina is quoted as saying it won't play well in the south.
But "Kenneth Foster, a communications professor at the University of Utah, thinks most voters will miss the nuance altogether. 'To the outside world, which knows nothing of Mormonism, how are you going to delineate 'I'm a sort-of-active Mormon?' he said. 'we can't even delineate that internally. It's going to be, 'Are you, or are you not?'"
EMAIL: jwalker@desnews.com
- Provo couple killed in RV accident near St....
- Police were watching, listening to Josh and...
- Man charged with killing Ogden officer found...
- 'More questions than answers' as charges...
- Susan Powell's father wants help searching...
- Davis County honor student arrested in deaths...
- Parents of Sandy Hook victim, Emilie Parker,...
- Common Core State Standards attract...
- Chaffetz not willing to take...
71 - Man charged with killing Ogden officer...
40 - S.L. draws up airport plans
33 - Couples registry gets preliminary nod...
29 - 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah...
23 - Gov. Gary Herbert tells Washington...
17 - $2.6B needed for Utah to reach...
17 - Letters to family show Steven Powell...
17



I am personally more concerned about the evangelical candidates than I am about either Romney or Huntsman. Neither candidate would "push" their religion on the American people in any way. The values learned as members of the LDS church More..
Romney, like him or not, provides a very clear picture of a Romney White House. Look at how he has handled things in the past, his current positions on 'the issues' and you have your answer... a clear picture of Romney.
Huntsman also More..
Too many people in this world are extremists. Bennett wasn't conservative enough for the Tea Party. Pro-life democratic senators aren't allowed to speak at the democratic convention. If Huntsman isn't completely orthodox he's
"not a good More..