Some feel that the congressional Republicans should have been more compromising with President Barack Obama and Sen. Harry Reid. Obama's method in solving the debt problem was to increase revenues with a token effort to reduce spending.
If in your household you are several hundred thousand in debt, and you still can't pay your bills, do you go into more debt, or do you find ways to cut expenses? Why should the federal government operate any differently than the average household?
In the almost three years Obama has been president, there hasn't even been a budget passed, our debt has increased two-fold, the size of government continues to increase and the unemployment rate continues to hover at 9 percent. Revenues are not the problem, but spending is. Compromise without prudence is stupidity.
Frank C. Overfelt
- Disputes over specialized license plates...
- Mike Lee: Change is coming to Washington
- My view: Chaffetz named ‘politician of...
- Jay Evensen: Cuba not likely to change...
- In our opinion: Water, a precious commodity
- Susan Roylance: Definition of the family put...
- Lessons from 'Christmas Carol'
- Letter: Monolingual minorities
- Charles Krauthammer: Democrats use... 78
- In our opinion: Police training should... 45
- Mike Lee: Change is coming to Washington 44
- In our opinion: Wood burning ban... 37
- Robert Bennett: More political... 36
- My view: Chaffetz named... 34
- Letter: Patriots or serfs? 33
- Susan Roylance: Definition of the... 32