Some feel that the congressional Republicans should have been more compromising with President Barack Obama and Sen. Harry Reid. Obama's method in solving the debt problem was to increase revenues with a token effort to reduce spending.
If in your household you are several hundred thousand in debt, and you still can't pay your bills, do you go into more debt, or do you find ways to cut expenses? Why should the federal government operate any differently than the average household?
In the almost three years Obama has been president, there hasn't even been a budget passed, our debt has increased two-fold, the size of government continues to increase and the unemployment rate continues to hover at 9 percent. Revenues are not the problem, but spending is. Compromise without prudence is stupidity.
Frank C. Overfelt
- Jay Evensen: Legislature's pornography...
- Jay Evensen: Ask people in the Third World if...
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe?
- Ralph Hancock: The anti-establishment delusion
- Jonathan Johnson: The truth about sales tax...
- In our opinion: Critics of porn resolution...
- In our opinion: National security and the...
- Dan Liljenquist: Increasing police officer pay
- In our opinion: National security and... 77
- Is it time for our first woman president? 55
- Robert J. Samuelson: The false charms... 55
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe? 35
- Barack Obama: Religious freedom keeps... 33
- Jay Evensen: Legislature's pornography... 31
- Letter: Coal and job creation 23
- Ralph Hancock: The anti-establishment... 19