Some feel that the congressional Republicans should have been more compromising with President Barack Obama and Sen. Harry Reid. Obama's method in solving the debt problem was to increase revenues with a token effort to reduce spending.
If in your household you are several hundred thousand in debt, and you still can't pay your bills, do you go into more debt, or do you find ways to cut expenses? Why should the federal government operate any differently than the average household?
In the almost three years Obama has been president, there hasn't even been a budget passed, our debt has increased two-fold, the size of government continues to increase and the unemployment rate continues to hover at 9 percent. Revenues are not the problem, but spending is. Compromise without prudence is stupidity.
Frank C. Overfelt
- In our opinion: Tragedy in Aleppo should...
- My view: Waste, fraud in education hammering...
- Richard Davis: Who needs to go to the bathroom
- Jay Evensen: Like it or not, politics and...
- Letter: Where's the action?
- Letter: BYU in a conference?
- Jay Evensen: Utah's election is clear as mud
- My view: Mitt Romney's Harry Potter moment:...
- My view: A de-sexed society is a... 68
- Orrin Hatch: My meeting with Supreme... 45
- My view: Mitt Romney's Harry Potter... 43
- Richard Davis: Who needs to go to the... 37
- Jay Evensen: Like it or not, politics... 22
- In our opinion: Not all economic... 20
- Letter: Trump's delegate count 19
- Letter: Where's the action? 17