Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The contest between Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman Jr.
Scott G. Winterton, Deseret News
With two "favorite sons" in the race, the 2012 presidential battle is especially fun for Utahns to watch. The national media can't get enough of the Mormon angle, especially with the award-winning Broadway play "The Book of Mormon" selling out through the rest of the year. National political writers are calling us for updates on the Utah intrigue generated by the contest between Jon Huntsman Jr. and Mitt Romney. So we thought we'd join the fun.
Both Romney and Huntsman are aggressively seeking support, money and volunteers from Utah. Is this likely to cause a rift inside the Utah Republican Party for the next year?
Pignanelli: "But, y'all know, … I like Huntsman and Romney. Romney's a much better candidate than he was last time … Huntsman hasn't said what he's for yet, but I just kinda like him." — Former President Bill Clinton The competition for Utah support between Huntsman and Romney has highlighted, and solidified, the different approaches each has taken towards Utah.
Romney has cultivated local Republican officials, while Huntsman has been more selective in his affections. Also, as governor, Huntsman was not shy about expressing opinions contrary to those held by most Utah Republicans (i.e., global warming and civil unions). The resulting support of Utah Republican officials for Romney was a non-issue — until Huntsman entered the race.
However, those Utahns with fondness for Huntsman and his family, regardless of Romney's popularity, are now receiving attention. Also, some Utahns are weary of Romney's pitch that he "saved the 2002 Olympics" from the incompetence of us Utah yokels. Most insiders believe the Olympics were on the road to recovery — the state and the LDS Church would not allow the games to fail. Many residents (including me) believe the logical choice to lead the Olympics was a Utahn — Jon Huntsman. After all, we were willing to entrust the leadership of our state to him only a few years later.
The Huntsman Romney contest will not harm the Republican Party. But it will publicize the emotions, previously unknown, that Utahns have for and against these candidates.
Webb: Romney has been running for years and has had much more time to cultivate support, so he's well ahead in Utah — both in the number of key leaders backing him and grass-roots voter support. The list of supporters he recently released was quite impressive. Romney is viewed a bit larger-than-life than is Huntsman, who suffers from the "prophet is without honor" syndrome. Huntsman does have some key Utahns supporting him, and if Romney wasn't in the race, he'd be the runaway favorite, except among some on the far right. Ultimately, Utah voters will united behind the nominee.
Romney was pushing for the Utah GOP presidential primary to be held in March instead of the approved date in June. The campaign rationale was that getting a nice early win in Utah would provide momentum and hand Huntsman a defeat in his home state. Should the primary be held earlier?
Pignanelli: Moving the primary will cost Utah taxpayers over $3 million. So long as Romney (and possibly Huntsman) are on a presidential ballot in Utah, no other candidate is going to pay attention to the state. Therefore, it's a waste of money.
Webb: This was a cute idea, but it would never fly. At a time of state budget crises, Utah taxpayers would never tolerate spending $3 million for 15 minutes of fame and a Romney boost. It shows the Romney strategists are thinking creatively and are willing to play hardball with Huntsman, but this was a non-starter.
What's the upside and downside from the Romney vs. Huntsman battle, the high-profile that these individuals will receive and their chosen faith, in the national spotlight?
- Disputes over specialized license plates...
- Mike Lee: Change is coming to Washington
- Jay Evensen: Cuba not likely to change...
- My view: Chaffetz named ‘politician of...
- In our opinion: Water, a precious commodity
- Lessons from 'Christmas Carol'
- Letter: Monolingual minorities
- Dan Liljenquist: Being good for goodness sake
- Charles Krauthammer: Democrats use... 78
- In our opinion: Police training should... 45
- Mike Lee: Change is coming to Washington 44
- Robert Bennett: More political... 36
- My view: Chaffetz named... 34
- Letter: Patriots or serfs? 33
- Susan Roylance: Definition of the... 32
- Jay Evensen: Cuba not likely to change... 30