In wake of R.I. and N.Y. votes, is the legalization of gay marriage inevitable?

Published: Tuesday, July 5 2011 1:00 p.m. MDT

Some point to the recent legalization of same-sex marriage in New York and Rhode Island's passage of civil unions last week as signs that America's "march to official recognition of gay marriage by lawmakers and the courts is inevitable," according to Dennis Byrne's article, "Gay marriage across the land: Not so darn fast" in the Chicago Tribune.

Yet, the gay-marriage cause still faces considerable public opposition, according to Bryne. "So far, the question has been put directly to American voters 31 times, and 31 times voters have said marriage is a one-man and one-woman deal," said Byrne, citing stats from the chairwoman of the National Organization for Marriage, Maggie Gallagher.

Byrne further cited a recent Alliance Defense Fund poll suggesting that "62 percent of Americans agreed — and 53 percent strongly agreed — with the statement, 'I believe marriage should be defined only as a union between one man and one woman.'"

But now that the dust has settled, and gays can legally marry in the state of New York, opinion columnist Ross Douthat wrote that the future of gay marriage in New York is in the hands of gays and gays alone.

"In New York, as in five states before it, gay marriage's future is in the hands of gay couples themselves," wrote Douthat in a piece titled, "More Perfect Unions" in The New York Times. "Over the decades ahead, their choices will gradually transform gay marriage from an idea into a culture: they'll determine the social expectations associated with gay wedlock, the gay marriage and divorce rates ... They'll also help determine gay marriage's impact on the broader culture of matrimony in America."

Duthat highlights three possible effects that gay marriage could have on the "broader culture of matrimony in America." He first proffers an idea from Jonathan Rauch's book, "Gay Marriage: Why It Is Good for Gays, Good for Straights, and Good for America," which argues that gay marriage will help breed marital conservatism, helping confirm "marriage's status as the gold standard for committed relationships."

Opposite Rauch's theory are marital-liberationists, who according to Douthat, "hope that gay marriage will help knock marriage off its cultural pedestal altogether." These liberationists in the gay-marriage movement are what social conservatives worry about the most — they hope, according to Duthat, to gradually decline the importance of the marital institution in American society.

"Still, there's a third vision that's worth pondering — neither conservative nor liberationist, but a little bit of both," Douthat continued. "This vision embraces the institution of marriage ... But it also hints that the example of same-sex unions might partially transform marriage from within, creating greater institutional flexibility — particularly sexual flexibility — for straight and gay spouses alike."

It is the idea that matrimony should not inherently include complete sexual fidelity. This idea is espoused by noted author, and married homosexual, Dan Savage, recently profiled by the New York Times. According to Douthat's article, Savage suggests in his memoir "The Commitment" that matrimony is best when it loosens its moral demands in a controlled way. For example Savage wrote positively about the way in which he and his partner managed their extra-marital sex in a way which he claimed made for a more stable home for raising their child while accomodating their desires for "outside sexual contact."

Try out the new DeseretNews.com design!
try beta learn more
Get The Deseret News Everywhere