Would adopting a flat tax benefit the United States? Yes
Pro: Yes, it would lead to prosperity
As we celebrate our independence this Fourth of July, it's important to remember that unfair taxation was a key cause of our revolution.
When the population of the colonies felt that high taxes imposed by powerful elites in faraway London were unfair, intrusive and unjust, a revolution followed.
Today, Americans can see the federal government in Washington shoveling their tax dollars out the door faster than you can say King George III.
Democrats and Republicans are in stormy negotiations to curb runaway spending and trim a bloated deficit, but any revolution in spending habits must be coupled with a simple, flat-tax system if it is to provide America with long-lasting prosperity.
The flat tax should more correctly be called the "fair tax." It is the type of tax envisioned, proposed and supported when the 16th Amendment was passed in 1913 allowing for direct taxation of citizens by the federal government.
The tax that was supported in the amendment was 1 percent on the first $20,000 of income — $425,000 of earnings today considering inflation over the last 98 years — with a surcharge of 6 percent for income exceeding $500,000. The form and instructions were four pages and the return was filed on a post card.
Over the years, the tax code has become an incomprehensible monstrosity that imposes taxes and grants exceptions based upon political power rather than economic reason. It has become a major source of campaign funds for politicians. And it has created the most feared of all government agencies, the Internal Revenue Service.
To stay competitive, the United States must reform the tax system and a return to the simplicity envisioned when the 16th Amendment was proposed and passed. It is ironic that many countries around the world, including a number of former Soviet bloc nations, are adopting the flat-tax model as the most simple and direct way to collect taxes.
The advantages of a flat tax are numerous and well documented, including:
Eliminating political deductions for well-connected industries and individuals and back-door social engineering.
Vastly reducing the volumes of tax code that even the experts admit they don't understand, as well as reducing the size of the tax collection bureaucracy.
Spurring economic growth by eliminating taxation on savings and investing so that prudent productive individuals and businesses prosper. And it would also eliminate the huge costs of preparing mountains of tax returns for the government.
- Robert J. Samuelson: Rethink the notion that...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
- Robert Bennett: How I came to write a weekly...
- In our opinion: Editorial: Underwater...
- It's déjà vu all over again with...
- Would repossessing federal lands help fund...
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - It's déjà vu all over again...
33 - Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
30 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
21 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
19 - Would repossessing federal lands help...
18 - Letter: Citizens must overlook emotions...
17 - Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
13







DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments