Critics say the events are stacked toward well-funded campaigns that can afford to buy blocs of tickets and ferry their supporters to the events.
Iowa Republican Party officials have pushed back against criticisms that its event is a money grab by the Iowa Republican Party. Candidates bid thousands of dollars for plots on the coliseum grounds to erect tents to feed and entertain supporters. The 2007 straw poll cost the state GOP roughly $600,000. Party officials also have lowered the ticket price by $5 to $30 since 2007.
"The notion that the straw poll is seven-figure windfall to the Republican Party of Iowa is simply not accurate. We hope to generate income and have money left over and organize for 2012," Strawn said.
Iowa's has had the effect of stamping front-runners and drive up expectations, as they did for George W. Bush with his victory at Ames in August 1999; likewise with Romney after his all-out effort in 2007.
But Iowa's straw poll also can hobble a candidate who does not meet expectations, as it did for then-Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback and former Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson in 2007. And only twice in the four Iowa straw polls since the meager 1979 turnout has the eventual caucus winner won.
Mike DuHaime, who managed Giuliani's campaign, said other candidates need more than Romney does the lift a straw poll victory can create.
"It can help create the perception of a serious, national candidate. Most people already believe that about Gov. Romney," said DuHaime. "Why go out and spend a lot of money for something that doesn't carry with it something tangible?"
- Mothers on meth: New book highlights family...
- Defending the Faith: A case for the...
- Affordable Care Act could bring 'skinny'...
- How colleges take from the poor, give to the...
- Mistake or miracle: New evidence on the...
- Gallup poll shows shift in views on morality...
- Wash. I-5 bridge collapse caused by oversize...
- Boy Scouts open membership to all boys,...
- Defending the Faith: A case for the...
64 - Boy Scouts open membership to all boys,...
48 - IRS official Lerner invokes Fifth...
22 - Former IRS chief to Congress: Can't say...
21 - Gallup poll shows shift in views on...
21 - US companies challenging contraception...
20 - IRS role in Obamacare adds deeper layer...
16 - Fire chief says search almost complete...
15



Palin would lose by 20 to Obama. One in 5 Republicans would vote for Obama over Palin. I'm one of them. The enemy I know is much preferred over the enemy I don't know. While neither Obama or Palin are my enemies, the maxim holds true in this More..
If Republicans aren't careful, they are going to talk themselves and each other out of any viable candidate.
Palin? You would vote for a candidate who does not know one of the most historic events of American History? Did you not see her meltdown concerning Paul Revere? Okay I have to stop laughing here.