The formation of the new .xxx domain name for sexually explicit and pornographic material was approved on March 18 by the organization governing domain names, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). After the announcement, an executive stated, "ICANN's decision to give .xxx final approval is a landmark moment for the Internet."
While claiming to have the best interest of the Internet at heart, it appears the real interest is the revenue to be generated by selling domain names to porn distributors. According to ICMRegistry, the company authorized to oversee the .xxx domain, 528,335 websites have submitted domain name reservations as of March 28. At the anticipated cost of $60 per website, a whopping $31,700,100 in revenue is anticipated, and the numbers are growing.
It is unfortunate that so often pecuniary gain for the one controls the collective conscience of humanity more than decency and good judgment.
We have seen an interesting phenomenon with the Internet. As the supply of porn has increased, there has been a corresponding increase in the demand for such material. Yet policymakers continue to make decisions that effectively increase porn's supply to those who are harmed the most by such content: children, individuals and families.
Social experts increasingly recognize that forming positive loving relationships, both in and out of the home, and seeing individuals as more than mere objects to be acted on are severely compromised when one uses porn.
Additionally, science has now concluded that porn is addicting, like gambling and overeating, and can diminish a person's ability to make rational, healthy decisions. The effects of porn are devastating. And like other addicting substances, the secondary effects — to children, spouses, loved ones and even other innocent members of society — are also devastating.
Ecclesiastical leaders and professionals who counsel users of porn and those experiencing secondary effects will unequivocally testify to the devastation, heartache and unhappiness.
Some may attempt to diminish the mounting evidence by arguing that "the data can't be conclusive because I am not experiencing any negative effects by viewing porn." This ignores reality and is akin to arguing that "I have not experienced any harmful effects from drinking. So harmful effects of alcohol consumption don't exist."
- Robert J. Samuelson: Rethink the notion that...
- In our opinion: Editorial: Underwater...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
- My view: Adjusting the definition of marriage
- Would repossessing federal lands help fund...
- Robert Bennett: How I came to write a weekly...
- Kathleen Parker: In politics, honesty and...
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
36 - It's déjà vu all over again...
33 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
21 - My view: Adjusting the definition of...
21 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
19 - Would repossessing federal lands help...
18 - Letter: Citizens must overlook emotions...
17






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments