At least our legislative leaders were honest — they rather bragged about implementing a back-room deal to strike down key elements of the open records laws in a non-election year so that voters would forget about it when it's time to re-elect them. And since the Legislature operates in essentially a one-party state, they have little fear of voter retribution for this take-back of citizens rights.
Essentially, their attitude is "We know what's best for you so you should trust us to do what's right — no need to examine our motives or communications with each other." Now we only get to know the results of their decisions — not how they reach them.
I have written to Gov. Gary Herbert requesting that he veto this bill. If changes need to be made to the open records laws they should be taken after careful consideration and public input — and in an election year would be best so the voters do pay attention.
- In our opinion: Boy Scouts of America and...
- Was Hillary right to compare Putin to Hitler?
- Sen. Ted Cruz opens 2014 CPAC with...
- My view: History lesson — 'Taking back'...
- Endangered Species Act lost sight of its mission
- Who are the real heroes of election reform?
- Letter: Religious freedom
- Robert J. Samuelson: Income tax has become a...
- Letter: Minimum Wage insufficient 66
- Has Obama's foreign policy emboldened... 62
- Jay Evensen: Obama could use a dose of... 60
- Letter: Religious freedom 52
- Obama's biggest test: Ukraine 33
- Sen. Ted Cruz opens 2014 CPAC with... 27
- In our opinion: Boy Scouts of America... 27
- Was Hillary right to compare Putin to... 26