On Feb. 18 you began an article on the front page, written by Tad Walch, headlined, "Cambridge calls porn a public service." The headline was misleading and slanderous to Cambridge University in England. Cambridge's student population is over 17,000, according to Wikipedia sources. The debate which took place at Cambridge about whether or not porn provides a "good public service" was attended by approximately 615 students, and 231 of these students voted in favor of a proposition that porn is a good public service.
I fail to see how such a meager number of students can be construed to state that Cambridge University claims porn a public service. The headline ought to have been something like, ".01 Percent of Cambridge students vote porn as a public service."
- Robert J. Samuelson: The Olympic sinkhole
- In our opinion: Finding – not forcing...
- Michael Gerson: The Dalai Lama's path to peace
- About Utah: Others opened the door, but she...
- Doug Robinson: Leonardo chief's doing a job...
- My view: Biggest reason for physician shortage
- On Second Thought: A lighthearted look at the...
- In our opinion: Those intolerable TSA...
- In our opinion: Finding – not... 84
- Letter: Nothing is 'free' 57
- My view: Mitt Romney's Harry Potter... 42
- My view: A de-sexed society is a... 40
- Richard Davis: Who needs to go to the... 37
- Orrin Hatch: My meeting with Supreme... 25
- In our opinion: Those intolerable TSA... 22
- In our opinion: A social media enabled... 22