I'm curious about all the hoopla surrounding a computer's recent defeat of Jeopardy champions Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter. Lest we become too enamored with technology, we should answer a few questions. Did a machine build the computer? Did a machine program the computer? Did a machine accumulate all the knowledge that was dumped into the computer? "Watson" is nothing more than a huge collective memory bank that can retrieve stored information very efficiently. Human beings built it, human beings programmed it and thousands of human beings contributed the facts that were dumped into it. Any football team with eleven players can defeat a single star player. The much larger team opposing Jennings and Rutter naturally beat them by using the medium of admirable, but manmade technology.
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet
- School fees: Is Utah really family friendly?
- Charles Krauthammer: Solution to inversion is...
- Letter: Society puzzles
- 20 of the most influential and innovative...
- Equality in family life does not mean sameness
- Jay Evensen: Utahns support Common Core, even...
- Michael Gerson: State of Israel: History...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb:... 82
- Letter: Police brutality 62
- School fees: Is Utah really family... 48
- Mary Barker: Our economic discourse... 43
- Richard Davis: The State Board can do... 42
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet 39
- Constitutional commitments trump tribal... 35
- Letter: Society puzzles 32