Quantcast

House Republicans attack regulations; Dems defend

By Larry Margasak

Associated Press

Published: Wednesday, Jan. 26 2011 4:10 p.m. MST

House Natural Resources Committee chairman Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash, left, shares a laugh with Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., right, before the start of a committee hearing on Wednesday, Jan. 26, 2011, in Washington.

Kevin Wolf, Associated Press

WASHINGTON — House Republicans launched a tirade Wednesday at Obama administration regulations, reversing what had been an unusual display of unity hours earlier at the president's State of the Union speech.

     In one of the first hearings of the Republican-run Congress, GOP lawmakers accused unelected administration bureaucrats of issuing rules that cost American jobs. Democrats insisted those same regulations protected public health and the environment, saved the U.S. auto industry and lessened dependence on foreign oil.

     The sole witness before the House Energy and Commerce investigative subcommittee, administration regulation chief Cass Sunstein, reminded Republicans that "job creation is in the first sentence" of President Barack Obama's recent executive order to review all government regulations.

     Business groups and Republican allies have complained bitterly that regulations implementing new health care, toxic emissions and financial overhaul laws, among others, are holding back hiring and economic growth.

      Tuesday night, Republicans and Democrats sat together for President Barack Obama's State of the Union speech to demonstrate unity following the assassination attempt against Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz. On Wednesday, partisanship was back to normal, and the hearing raised questions about whether the two parties can work together as the president suggested in his speech.

     The chairman of the subcommittee, Florida Republican Cliff Stearns, went on the offensive at the outset, accusing the Obama administration of a "rush to regulate" and issuing job-killing regulations based on political correctness.

          He said the administration of George W. Bush objected to regulations from nearly two-dozen agencies while the Obama administration has objected to none.

          For much of the hearing, lawmakers from the two parties were talking more to each other than the witness — who often was cut off by Republicans who wanted to use their five minutes of question time to make statements condemning the administration.

          Stearns demanded that Sunstein answer yes or no to his questions, frequently stopping the witness' attempts to defend rules by the Environmental Protection Agency and other federal departments.

          Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., said that unlike the Republicans, she "would like to hear answers to some of these questions."

          Defending proposed environmental rules on controlling boiler emissions and greenhouse gases, she asked Sunstein whether the rulemaking allowed comments from the public and especially from industry.

          "Yes, and it continues," Sunstein said.

          "Over 4,800 comments, including a large amount from industry," DeGette said.

          "Yes, I'm aware of the sheer volume of comments," Sunstein replied.

      Democratic Rep. Edward Markey of Massachusetts commended the administration, saying it saved the U.S. auto industry with stricter mileage standards that produced fuel-efficient cars that Americans wanted to buy.

     He said limits on harmful emissions into the environment increased jobs in clean energy fields, in addition to saving the cost of treating environment-based illnesses and cleaning up environmental damage.

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS