"Stop your whining and just do it." That's what my wife tells me as I try to get sympathy for having a messy closet. I have a million T-shirts I can't get rid of; even the one from my little league coaching days. This year I took her advice; I got rid of three T-shirts. It took courage, but it's a start.
So I'm thinking, with Becky Lockhart, R-Provo, the first woman ever as Utah's Speaker of the House (in my house "woman speaker" would be redundant), this legislative session will be different; I hope our lawmakers will stop their whining about big government and clean house. Maybe their new leader will help them see that the mess of laws they have created, like my old T-shirts, are just clutter that keeps them from doing the people's business; while they enjoy passing laws, these also add to the government bloating they complain about — more regulations, more bureaucrats needed to write them, more regulators and more compliance workers to make sure they are followed.
By the time a government agency is through writing policies and regulations to implement the new laws, any relation to their original intent is purely coincidental. Bureaucrats write them to protect themselves. That's why regulations are written in great detail, directing the process to be followed so "nothing can happen on their watch," and then are bound in elaborate agency policy manuals. John W. Gardner said it best, "The last dying breath of a bureaucracy is to write another policy in the policy manual."
With new leadership, I'm guessing there will be a lot of getting rid of clutter and waste and remodeling our government closets. She may be asking why don't we get rid of old laws and regulations that only create inertia in our economy, and begin delivering timely public service in a more cost-effective way? Rather than studies to make government more efficient, she might be concerned about making it more effective, including getting rid of outdated offices instead of keeping them around like my old coaching T-shirt.
She might even ask why don't we listen and respond to the concerns of our people instead of special interest groups; and when we receive a legislative audit, why don't we make sure corrective action is taken instead of letting it gather dust on the shelf? That's stewardship.
- It's déjà vu all over again with...
- Robert Bennett: How I came to write a weekly...
- Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- In our opinion: It would not hurt Americans...
- John Florez: Let's make education's Common...
- Would repossessing federal lands help fund...
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - It's déjà vu all over again...
32 - Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
26 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
21 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
18 - Would repossessing federal lands help...
18 - Letter: Citizens must overlook emotions...
16 - Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
13







DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments