Lee H. Hamilton correctly identifies ways in which "Congressional polarization is hurting us at home and abroad" (Nov. 19), including "a judicial confirmation process that is long on rancorous debates over judicial philosophy and short on actual confirmations. The judiciary is being hobbled by congressional polarization."
Bizarrely, however, Senate Republican "holds" have even blocked Utah's Scott Matheson Jr. and other consensus nominees who have strong support from home-state Republican senators.
In early June, the Senate Judiciary Committee approved Matheson's 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals nomination without dissent, and Sen. Orrin Hatch promised to "do everything in my power to get him through as soon as I can."
Since then, judicial vacancies have soared to over 100, including 50 judicial emergencies, and current and retired Republican-appointed federal judges have urged the Senate to stop delaying and act now on all the pending nominees. Since 2001 I have headed the environmental community's Judging the Environment project on federal judicial nominations.
Glenn Sugameli
Washington, D.C.
- Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running shoe...
- Snapshot of 2013 in political cartoons
- Timothy R. Clark: Graduation advice for my...
- Letters: Threats justified
- My view: Nothing sinister about Common Core
- State pensions threaten to bleed states dry
- In our opinion: Limit the power of the...
- Snapshot of 2013 in political cartoons
Subscribe
Mobile
RSS
This is what happens when judges decide issues that should be left to the legislative branch of government. We begin to mistrust them.
Oh, the horror! How DARE those pesky judges refuse to allow people's Constitutional rights to be trampled, just because the majority want it it that way. Shame on THEM!!!!!
When the majority acts/legislaties in a way that impairs the More..
@ AlanSutton: Please provide one instance where a judge has acted in a legislative manner.