Old-style coal plants expanding
Spate of new facilities raises environmental and social concerns
Jon LaCour, manager of Wygen III coal-fired plant in Wyoming, looks over pollution control equipment.
Associated Press
WYODAK, Wyo. — Utilities across the country are building dozens of old-style coal plants that will cement the industry's standing as the largest industrial source of climate-changing gases for years to come.
An Associated Press examination of U.S. Department of Energy records and information provided by utilities and trade groups shows that more than 30 traditional coal plants have been built since 2008 or are under construction.
The construction wave stretches from Arizona to Illinois and South Carolina to Washington, and comes despite growing public wariness over the high environmental and social costs of fossil fuels, demonstrated by tragic mine disasters in West Virginia, the Gulf oil spill and wars in the Middle East.
The expansion, the industry's largest in two decades, represents an acknowledgment that highly touted "clean coal" technology is still a long way from becoming a reality and underscores a renewed confidence among utilities that proposals to regulate carbon emissions will fail. The Senate last month scrapped the leading bill to curb carbon emissions following opposition from Republicans and coal-state Democrats.
"Building a coal-fired power plant today is betting that we are not going to put a serious financial cost on emitting carbon dioxide," said Severin Borenstein, director of the Energy Institute at the University of California-Berkeley. "That may be true, but unless most of the scientists are way off the mark, that's pretty bad public policy."
Federal officials have long struggled to balance coal's hidden costs against its more conspicuous role in providing half the nation's electricity.
Hoping for a technological solution, the Obama administration devoted $3.4 billion in stimulus spending to foster "clean-coal" plants that can capture and store greenhouse gases. Yet new investments in traditional coal plants total at least 10 times that amount — more than $35 billion.
Utilities say they are clinging to coal because its abundance makes it cheaper than natural gas or nuclear power and more reliable than intermittent power sources such as wind and solar. Still, the price of coal plants is rising and consumers in some areas served by the new facilities will see their electricity bill rise by up to 30 percent.
Industry representatives say those increases would be even steeper if utilities switched to more expensive fuels or were forced to adopt emission-reduction measures.
- KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
- Selling adventure: How Backcountry.com's CEO...
- Studies try to find why poorer people are...
- West Jordan teen releases 5th iPhone app
- KSL TV news icon Bruce Lindsay calls it a career
- Balancing act: Company offers 5 things to...
- On Leadership: Highly engaged employees look...
- Wasting Money: Designer pet clothing and 59...
- Studies try to find why poorer people...
27 - KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
17 - Millennials love to spend money they...
13 - House GOP plans summer tax cut vote
7 - Consumer confidence highest in 4½...
6 - Salt Lake Tribune halts Spanish...
2 - Typical CEO made $9.6M last year, AP...
1 - Selling adventure: How...
1






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments