Breck England (Readers' Forum, May 21) would do well to actually read the Arizona immigration reform statute before writing so passionately against it. Under the law, a person can only be questioned about his or her immigration status after having been detained for an infraction of some existing law, such as a traffic violation. And the person thus detained can only be asked questions regarding immigration status if the officer has probable cause to question the person's status.
An example of probable cause would be the lack of a driver's license or, perhaps, 15 adults crowded into a van. Suggesting that the Arizona immigration statute is tantamount to "the Gestapo and KGB constantly stopping non-lily-white Caucasians and demanding papers" is a conclusion drawn by one who is ignorant of the provisions of the law.
David Snow
Farmington
- It's déjà vu all over again with...
- Robert Bennett: How I came to write a weekly...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
- George F. Will: A liberal squeeze play to...
- Would repossessing federal lands help fund...
- John Florez: Let's make education's Common...
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - Letter: Obama throws a curveball
31 - It's déjà vu all over again...
31 - Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich...
26 - Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
22 - Letter: Age really matters regarding...
21 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
21 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
18






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments