Analysis: Is this the 'change' voters believe in?

By Liz Sidoti

Associated Press

Published: Tuesday, March 23 2010 9:38 a.m. MDT

An AP News Analysis

WASHINGTON — Love or hate the country's new health care policy, this much is indisputable: President Barack Obama accomplished a breathtaking feat that had eluded other presidents.

He persuaded a deeply divided Congress to pass sweeping legislation remaking one-sixth of the U.S. economy. He did it in a hypermedia world in a hyperpartisan city that he barely knew, that most people detest. He did it without most Americans supporting the plan.

But most of all, he brought change — as promised. But is it the kind Americans want?

Voters who complained they were sick of the status quo must now decide whether this is — to borrow Obama's campaign motto — the change they believe in.

That choice will be the basis on which the nation will judge Obama, from his first midterm elections this fall to his likely re-election campaign in 2012. Now until then, the president will try to convince a skeptical public that he's done the right thing.

"This is what change looks like," Obama said on the first day of the rest of his presidency.

Every president brings change to some degree, and politicians always throw around the word during times of great upheaval. But Obama is unusual.

"With him, it's not just change that he wants: It's transformational change to make society a fairer place," said Stanley Renshon, a political psychologist at the City University of New York Graduate Center.

With health care, Renshon said, "he's forcing change that people don't want against their will." And, he said, backlash is possible if Obama is emboldened to push other big measures that divide the country, like immigration reform.

"Call it the audacity of transformation," added Renshon, who is writing a book on Obama.

Obama didn't create the call for change that he ran on in 2008. He seized it, tapping into people's angst as they tired of George W. Bush and Republican rule. The Democrat became the best messenger for change because people could attach their hopes to him, regardless of whether they agreed with the fine print.

"I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views," Obama said in his 2006 book, "The Audacity of Hope."

Two years later, there was an inherent contradiction in his pitch. He promised policy changes ripped from the Democratic playbook. And he promised to be post-partisan. The two don't jibe; he opened the door to criticism and, it turned out, set the table for his first presidential year.

He repeatedly let down those who voted for him. He became the face of the city people abhor. And, on health care, he engaged in partisan wrangling that voters despise.

But he got it done.

Or, as he put it: "We proved that we are still a people capable of doing big things and tackling our biggest challenges. We proved that this government — a government of the people and by the people — still works for the people."

People may not see it that way.

"Like beauty, change is in the eye of the beholder — and I don't think this health care bill is change," said Joan Hoff, a Montana State University history professor and a former president of the Center for the Study of the Presidency.

"His change has proven to be less dramatic than many of us thought he would deliver on when we were supporting him," added Hoff, an Obama voter who said the plan falls short of what she wants — national health insurance run by Washington.

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS