Everyone is asking why Washington is failing us. Not George but the elected leaders in his capital. They just can't seem to get along. Tea party here, liar there, one would think the two factions don't like each other. Major critical changes in our health system, wars, immigration laws, economic recovery and finance reform all need attention. So instead of playing nice, they either bully legislation through or obstruct its passage. Being a senator isn't fun anymore. Talk to retiring Sen. Evan Bayh from Indiana. To give up all the perks and power of Congress must mean it is really bad.
Everyone has a theory about the current atmosphere of hostility. Some go back to blame the Newt Gingrich-led Republican Revolution, while others date it back to the Civil War, when there were fisticuffs and caning to win over opponents to their way of thinking.
Whatever the origin, it continues today, and civility is becoming a thing of the past. Not that caning an opponent nearly to death was civil, but they used flowerier words when they did it. Why can't Congress just get along? We all look longingly for a bipartisan approach to America's problems, but we can forget it. It won't happen. Cooperation is against biological principles of temperament, child development and survival techniques possessed by the men and women who walk the halls of power. Our elective representatives are adults by age, but they were once babies. While these leaders pretend to act grown up, they all started like the rest of us in diapers. We all passed through childhood; some just didn't get all the way.
Everyone is born with a temperament. This is a collection of characteristics many feel are hard-wired into each of us. Some of the attributes are intensity, persistence and activity. Newborns who are intense, persistent and active grow up to be intense, persistent, active adults who run for political office.
There are other developmental reasons why there is no joy inside the Beltway. It has to do with the child-rearing techniques of the parents of politicians. There is a three-way approach to dealing with crying children. You can ignore them, you can smother them with attention or you can sense what the child needs and respond consistent to the need. Then back off and let the child explore. The experts call the first two styles insecure and the last secure. Guess who goes into politics? You are right. The insecure avoidant and the insecure smothered. Who else needs the juices of power running through their veins to overcome their insecurities? The secures go about their business content with life and its simple pleasures, not needing the jolt of crowd adoration or the opiate of being in charge.
- It's déjà vu all over again with...
- Robert Bennett: How I came to write a weekly...
- Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- In our opinion: It would not hurt Americans...
- George F. Will: A liberal squeeze play to...
- Would repossessing federal lands help fund...
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - It's déjà vu all over again...
32 - Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
26 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
21 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
18 - Would repossessing federal lands help...
18 - Letter: Citizens must overlook emotions...
16 - Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
13






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments