Air standards ever changing

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 9, 2010 12:02 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

This time of year, when inversions trap dirty air in Utah's valleys, it's obvious that Utahns should do more to improve air quality.

In many respects, Utah has made considerable improvements in air quality due to the advent of cleaner burning fuels and high performance automobile engines. Few people or businesses burn coal for heat anymore. Public transportation, particularly light rail and commuter rail, has taken a considerable number of cars off the road.

Some of the improvements were the result of federal laws that set attainment benchmarks. These have largely been changes for the better.

But the Environmental Protection Agency's continual tinkering with the standards and its "proposed disapproval" of the state's plan to monitor and bring under control particulate matter pollution have frustrated state regulators. It's almost as if the state has entered a five-mile race, only to learn the finish line has been moved another mile. Or as Ernie Wessman, chairman of the state's air quality control board, lamented at a recent meeting of the group, "It's like having to follow a rule you don't know exists."

Not only is this frustrating from a regulation standpoint, federal transportation dollars are on the line.

Story continues below

Other than natural and exceptional events such as dust storms, fireworks displays or smoke from wildfires, Utah has been able to keep PM10 levels below the EPA's 24-hour standards established in 2005 — even during the worst winter inversions.

Two years later, the agency enacted a new rule that says "natural and exceptional" events have to be included in required counts, even if they push the rolling average above acceptable standards.

No wonder state regulators are at wits end. State and local governments could, conceivably, impose strict regulations about fireworks displays. But they have no control over natural events that pollute the air such as wildfires or dust storms. To threaten federal transportation funds — some of which include funding for mass transit — seems shortsighted.

The state air quality control board plans to send a letter to EPA officials explaining why it feels the state's plan still meets the criteria that was in play when it was submitted five years ago. Federal officials need to take time to consider the unique characteristics of the Mountain West and the state's earnest efforts to reach federal standards that, over the years, have become more stringent.

Recent comments

It's funny hearing American's complain about consumption, seeing that...

Randy | Feb. 9, 2010 at 6:43 p.m.

Beans | 4:04 p.m.

Conservatives aren't the only ones who object...

Hint to "Beans | 4:04 p.m. " | Feb. 9, 2010 at 4:52 p.m.

To "point "A" to point "B" | 8:23 a.m. " but fuel economy is only...

RedShirt | Feb. 9, 2010 at 4:41 p.m.

Image
Deseret News archives

With a blanket of dirty air hovering over the Wasatch Front, vehicles head up and down Little Cottonwood Canyon.

previousnext

Latest comments

Could somebody please explain to me, a self-proclaimed dummy, exactly how the...

Services for Marie Osmond's son

Marie & Family; We are so sorry for your loss. We know how you are feeling...

In the DC decision, the Supreme Court ruled states and local governments...

Police doubt Powell strip club story

Can we have News about searches please.For her not to contact her mother and...

Hatch launches new attacks on BCS

or may be for naught? A Boise State education is priceless.

I'm a U fan and can't stand the BSC. However, how about working to fix the...

It is okay, We will always in this state vote for the dishonest,...

Hatch launches new attacks on BCS

If you aren't a college football fan, why should you even care whether...

Way to go Coach Connor and all the guys! Take your great play to Nationals.

If the BCS is illegal, why hasn't the DOJ or FTC jumped all over it? Why...

Advertisements