Wyatt Earp

Although visually stunning, Costner and Kasdan's latest film can't sustain its 3-hour length.

Published: Wednesday, June 29 1994 12:00 a.m. MDT

In terms of accuracy and authenticity, there's no question that "Wyatt Earp" is an attempt by co-writer/director Lawrence Kasdan and Kevin Costner to get it right, to finally give the legend of the notorious lawman/outlaw a fair cinematic shake. But in doing so, they have crafted an interminably long (3 hours, 9 minutes), numbingly slow and woefully underdeveloped epic that is more likely to bring on drowsiness than enlightenment.

Taking Earp from youth to middle-age, the film begins with a brief allusion to the gunfight at the O.K. Corral, then drifts into its central narrative with Earp as a youngster.

Earp's father, played superbly by Gene Hackman, brings up his sons to believe that "Nothing counts as much as blood," meaning that family comes first. He also instills in the brothers a sense of patriarchal order, along with strong feelings about justice, which will dominate Wyatt's life in the years to come.

Hackman dominates the first section, but his role is all too brief. He's missed when he summarily disappears from the rest of the film, and you may wonder why Kasdan doesn't allow us to see his reactions to the lifestyle adopted by his sons in later life.

As Costner assumes the role of the adult Wyatt, we meet a youthful, vigorous adventurer who is deeply in love with the girl back home (Annabeth Gish) in the Midwest. But soon after they marry, she dies of typhoid while pregnant, and Costner becomes brooding and miserable for the rest of the film.

The bulk of Kasdan's narrative concentrates on Wyatt's years as a controversial lawman, recruiting his brothers as he attempts to bring law and order to a pair of boom towns, Dodge City and Tombstone, ignoring his drug-addicted wife for the affections of a Jewish actress and clashing with politics, powerful local villains and disgruntled sisters-in-law.

During these lengthy sequences, we meet Doc Holliday, always the most colorful figure in films about Wyatt Earp, and Dennis Quaid, who lost more than 40 pounds to assume the role of the tubercular dentist-turned-gambler, jump-starts the film's energy whenever he's on screen. Of course it helps that Kasdan has given him the best lines.

But one of the film's worst problems is its inability to satisfyingly develop any of the supporting characters, including Doc. Quaid manages to bring some heft to the role, despite its being underwritten, but others do not fare as well. When the movie is over, it's clear that we haven't gotten to know any of Wyatt's brothers, or any of the villains. ("Tombstone," last year's Wyatt yarn, which was itself no great shakes, did a much better job of fleshing out the characters.)