From Deseret News archives:

Lord of the Flies

Published: Wednesday, March 21, 1990 12:00 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

(BU) HARRY HOOK, the British director of "Lord of the Flies," says he was familiar with the earlier film version of William Golding's book, but it was far from a guide for his new adaptation.

"I've got nothing but respect for the original Peter Brooks version," Hook said in a telephone interview last week, "and it was not fresh on my mind when we embarked on this. So from my point of view I was just going back to the book. As a director I just wanted to deal with the subject of 25 boys left to their devices, how evil might grow and flourish and all that.

"There's no ignoring the fact that there was enormous baggage that came with it. People will come with thoughts on the project, just as I had. Nobody would be coming fresh. The awareness of the book is monumental."

Hook's film was cast with unknown child actors, many without professional experience. "There was no pressure for me to use stars. We were open to seeing professionals, but I preferred unknowns so we'd all be starting from the same base. None of them had stuff to unlearn, in terms of acting technique. We could all start from page one.

"We set up open calls in about eight cities (Los Angeles, New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Austin, Minneapolis, etc.), advertising in newspapers and having people come to hotels; cattle calls.

Story continues below

"(The budget was) about $8 1/2 million to $9 million, much of that going to the whole support system of keeping kids and parents alive in Jamaica (where the film was shot) to the status they've become to accustomed to."

One of Hook's biggest challenges was changing the nationality of the boys from Britons to Americans. "I hadn't spent a lot of time here, so all the little particular nuances of language and stuff came from a lot of Americans who were around and who would pick up on little things, as would the boys. They were the first ones to laugh at me if I asked them to do something specifically British."

As for the English film industry, Hook said it's alive, but not as prolific as filmmaking in other countries. Therefore, he said, he has no intention of limiting himself to British projects. "It's not easy to raise money (for film financing) in England. There are a few places you can go for money, but if they say no you haven't got a film, basically. And they are of a certain budget.

"I'll live there, it's my home. But I'll work all over the place."

Recent comments

This movie was awesome! I liked the Military concept of it and the...

Anonymous | June 8, 2009 at 1:28 p.m.

I Am Absolutely In LOVE with Chris Furrh.Esspecially when i saw him...

Anonymous | April 6, 2009 at 11:25 a.m.

hey everyone thanks for all your lovely comments. i havent really...

Anonymous | Jan. 13, 2009 at 5:58 a.m.

Movie Info
Rated R for violence, profanity.

Cast: Balthazar Getty, Chris Furrh.
FIND LOCAL MOVIE SHOWTIMES
previousnext

Latest comments

Why is Jamie Whittingham and her daughter on the field? In their excitement...

My parents also raised six Eagle Scouts, also their last, and seventh child...

Why does Oklahoma participate in athletics? Why is it some trivial thing...

Zoobs up past curfew make for great posts on the Des news, can't wait to read...

Atlantic hurricane season ends

the greater number of hurricanes in 2005 was due to global warming. Since the...

You sound like a bunch of trolls. Sure, it's tough to see them playing...

love it! Spot on!

What is with region 2 are they that bad? how many playoff spots does that...

Well, here we are at the crossroads of college football. The final BCS...

Get a life. This is old news. A lot of things are happening in the world and...

Advertisements