From Deseret News archives:

Per capita ranking OK, officials say

Published: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:46 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The federal government spent less per person in Utah than in almost any other state in 2006, according to a new census report.

Only Nevada ranked lower than the $6,162 per capita spent in Utah, according to the "Consolidated Federal Funds Report: 2006," released Wednesday by the U.S. Census Bureau.

When it comes to total federal funds, California got the biggest share — 10.3 percent of the $2.45 trillion the federal government spent domestically in 2006. The spending marks a 7.5 percent boost nationwide over 2005.

Utah received $15.7 billion — less than 1 percent of the total.

States at the top end of the report's per capita spending received more than double the amount spent in Utah.

However, state economist Juliette Tennert said the reason for Utah's shortfall isn't necessarily the state not getting its fair share. She points out that the top two states, Louisiana and Mississippi, received $16,263 and $14,516 per capita, respectively. Both of them, however, were recovering from Hurricane Katrina in 2006, and likely received large amounts of federal relief in its aftermath.

Another example was Alaska, which has a relatively small population that inflates the per capita amount.

Story continues below
Plus, she said, Utah doesn't have large numbers of the types of individuals who receive the funding.

"We don't have a lot of federal employees in Utah, and some of those government programs, relative to the rest of the nation," she said. "Utah doesn't have high participation in TANIF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families), Medicare or Medicaid."

Nearly half of all domestic spending — $1.16 trillion — went to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, according to the census report. And some $739 billion went to retirement and disability.

Utah, which has long been the nation's youngest state, doesn't receive as much federal funding in those areas as some other states, Tennert said.

"We have a lot of kids relative to adults," she said. "We're very young ... Because of our unique population, even though we are low, we are getting our fair share."

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said in a statement that the per capita numbers are no surprise given Utah's demographics as "a young population with many children and young families, people who live healthy lifestyles and are self-reliant and a very vibrant economy."

Hatch suggested that a better measure would show Utah's federal funding in areas such as transportation, defense spending and government contracting.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

Don't hold back. Tell us what you really think. It is amazing what built...

The AP Top 25

WHERE DID THE MIGHTY utes GO? OH, I SEE THEM THEY ARE MENTIONED IN THE...

Of course many of the businesses want taxes raised because their business...

Beer??? Utah has a zero-tolerance policy towards alcohol on campus, dorms ans...

Since the American population is mostly Catholic, is it ok for them to...

Alta lodge owner is constant

As an Alta skier since 1948 I must say it is the best snow on earth. I live...

How Much money would BYU save if they axed the sports program? Is even an...

Max Hall just defined his legacy which is sad for the young man. As much as...

Unfortunately, there are times where you must be a little more PC than usual....

Aggies hold on, win wild one

Winning 2 of the last 3 gives us some momentum going into the offseason. As...

Advertisements