From Deseret News archives:

New law bittersweet for mobile-home residents

Taylorsville had wanted to do more for residents

Published: Monday, March 10, 2008 12:07 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Jeannine Stewart, another resident in the senior community, said nine months is helpful, but "even longer would be better."

Mobile homes built before 1976 cannot be moved to a new park, which means some residents could have nowhere to go if forced to leave. Many mobile-home residents are on a fixed income, living on disability or Social Security payments, and they can't afford to move, said Joanne Benfatti, a board member of the Utah Mobile Homeowners Action Group.

Benfatti said the action group, which spoke out in favor of Taylorsville's efforts, is glad for the extended notice granted by HB48, but they plan to lobby for more protection for mobile-home residents next year. Benfatti was evicted from her mobile home in Cottonwood Heights before moving to a different mobile home park in Salt Lake City.

"This is a major problem," Benfatti said. "There are 75,000 people in mobile homes and they keep throwing them out, left and right. ... For me, it was either go buy a mobile home, or go to a homeless shelter. Those were my two choices, and I think a lot of people are in the same situation."


E-mail: achoate@desnews.com

Recent comments

Here's the thing, I put my home on your property--my HOME. Laws are...

Anonymous | April 16, 2008 at 10:19 p.m.

To Sarahs comment made on March 10th. The people are not getting free...

Joanne | March 18, 2008 at 6:53 a.m.

Dear "thinking for myself" are you a developer or are you just...

Mobile Home Resident | March 12, 2008 at 11:06 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Most Utahns unhappy with Obama

But the nooooo the GOP passes over Sec. Condi Rice, Sec. Colin...

yes a saw a similar recipe on youtube on Utah Homes & Garden Television......

Why is Y. ignoring spew of hatred?

I wish we were hearing about how good the last drive of the game was and the...

Hatch: Abortion amendment may fail

I would like abortion to be the right of the individual not the government....

If a person needs an abortion, I feel it is betterr than an unwanted birth....

The senate bill already prohibits taxpayer money from being spent on...

Are you REALLY so desperate for attention that you'll troll the DN website...

Thank goodness it'll only be for one term.

3,396 comments now. And to the 10:17 comment above, I'm not "whining about...

you already own utah. why do you need another state?

Advertisements