From Deseret News archives:

New law bittersweet for mobile-home residents

Taylorsville had wanted to do more for residents

Published: Monday, March 10, 2008 12:07 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
TAYLORSVILLE — Taylorsville residents have mixed feelings about a new law passed by the Legislature that gives more protection to mobile-home owners.

Once it is signed into law, HB48 will require owners of mobile-home parks to give their residents nine months of notice if they decide to sell their property for some other use. Giving mobile-home residents more time and more protection from losing their homes is an issue Taylorsville's City Council was on the verge of tackling just before the start of the legislative session, but now the subject is moot.

While the bill calls for a longer notice period, it also forbids cities from creating ordinances concerning mobile home park closures. That provision annihilates Taylorsville's plans to create a separate ordinance that would have helped to fund the moving costs of residents if they were forced from their homes.

"They did that because they don't want 250 different mobile home park closure permit ordinances," Taylorsville Mayor Russ Wall said. "We still have some work to do to resolve this. There are still some other issues that deal with how do you relocate folks when the land is sold out from underneath their home. That's a big issue."

Story continues below
Taylorsville's Ordinance Review Committee had been working on crafting an ordinance that called on whoever purchased the property to help pay for residents' relocation. The ordinance would have come with an appeal process for developers to make a case to the City Council if they felt relocation costs were unreasonable.

In return for paying the costs, the city could have compensated the developer with higher density allowances, said committee chairman Ted Jensen. The property owner wouldn't have been responsible for any of the costs, Jensen said.

"We weren't out to take advantage of anybody," Jensen said. "We were just trying to help some people that are in a tough spot."

Now Wall says the city's only option to help residents with moving costs is to work with the Legislature and encourage a bill next year that would address the issue.

"We're going to try to keep working on the problem until we find a solution that gives some security to the people that live in the parks," Wall said. "It's a terrible thing when, every day, you wake up and have the prospect of the land being sold out from under your home."

Taylorsville has three mobile home parks — Majestic Meadows, Majestic Oaks and Monte Vista — in one area of the city. One senior resident in Majestic Meadows said she thinks the Legislature "did a little bit, but not enough" to address the parks' vulnerability.

Recent comments

Here's the thing, I put my home on your property--my HOME. Laws are...

Anonymous | April 16, 2008 at 10:19 p.m.

To Sarahs comment made on March 10th. The people are not getting free...

Joanne | March 18, 2008 at 6:53 a.m.

Dear "thinking for myself" are you a developer or are you just...

Mobile Home Resident | March 12, 2008 at 11:06 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Utah GOP opposes ethics initiative

Ok, about 4-5 hands went up on this comment list. Read it, folks. It's...

Why would you give a cell phone anyways to a kid. Parents fault and problem...

Jazz: Miles, Kirilenko to play Friday

What do you mean coach Sloan didnt give him a chance untill last year. If...

Expert paid $500K for Mitchell report

I think the definition of being legally insane is being unable to...

NFL locals watch

Max Hall is still whining.

Oh, right George. Because bin Laden and the other two represent all of...

What I want to know is are the 11 kids, 1-13 yrs old that were flying with...

I agree with D Will that the mountain jerseys were the worst jerseys i can...

Boise State is so much better than it was when it played Oregon at the...

I like rabbits. How gross to think that some were bred to be snake food.

Advertisements