From Deseret News archives:

Is air pollution as harmful as smoking?

Doctors group says yes, but toxicologist says no

Published: Thursday, March 6, 2008 12:08 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The clean-air advocacy group Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment launched a heavy attack Wednesday against statements by a state toxicologist concerning the danger of smoking versus air pollution.

The state's Air Quality Board, which helps determine policy regarding pollution, heard a briefing Feb. 6 from Steven Packham, toxicologist for the Utah Division of Air Quality. He had objected to comparisons between air pollution's harmful effects and smoking five to 10 cigarettes a day, according to a copy of his statement that he provided to the Deseret Morning News.

"Most importantly, comparisons such as this grossly minimize the serious health effects of smoking, which is one of the leading causes of preventable death in the United States," he said. "Nicotine addiction and cancer put cigarettes in a league of their own. Breathing outdoor air, even on bad days, is not like smoking cigarettes."

He said citizens concerned about air quality are important allies to public agencies that enforce air standards. "But exaggerated claims by public agencies or citizens regarding pollution and its impact on health are counterproductive," the statement said.

Putting aside the question of cancer, Packham said, the dose of particulates in the air per day and per lifetime is 200 times smaller than that from five cigarettes a day.

Story continues below
Dr. Brian Moench, president of the physicians group, commented, "Does anyone really see a danger that Utah will become overly zealous in protecting public health?"

That would be a miracle, he added.

"More people die of air pollution than die of traffic accidents, but they seldom make the evening news," said Dr. Howie Garber. "We're selling the idea that all of us suffer from poor air quality, especially our children."

Concerning smoking and air pollution, said Dr. Courtney Henley, the physicians feel it "is a valid comparison that is substantiated by the medical literature." She cited a long list of health-oriented groups that have taken that position.

The American Heart Association says air pollution can cut from 1.8 to 3.1 years from a person's life in badly polluted cities. The American Lung Association put it at one to three years, according to Henley.

"The Wasatch Front typically ranks in the top 10" in terms of spikes of air pollution, she said.

Recent comments

I don't know if I believe it, but having asthma definetly makes me...

Saila | March 25, 2008 at 9:01 p.m.

The Doctors are parroting the sierra Club's line on pollution and...

Doctors Parrot Sierra Club | March 6, 2008 at 4:30 p.m.

You ignore Steve Packham's position on air pollution. Although he...

He says our air is unacceptable | March 6, 2008 at 4:03 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Top 5 Players in minutes played: Utah 1 Fr, 2 Jr, 2 Sr Jr Carlon Brown...

Yep "self righteous" if the rest of us who don't rubber neck left, you would...

Jazz notes: 15th most-valuable team

Thank you for keeping the team here for all of these years, and for always...

Jazz fall apart late at L.A.

of misery, inconsistency, road games losses and of course, NO TITLE ! Long...

Glad to hear about Matt and the others who demonstrate you can play at a high...

I guess they forgot that God made clothes for Adam and Eve and that was...

and good luck.

Panel passes BCS playoff bill

There is an inherent problem in any rating system -- it takes into account...

Give Phillips some credit. He was 5/5 in field goals in the YBU game, and the...

Letters: Earth at center?

Mr. Bender's kind of thinking doesn't even acknowledge that the world is...

Advertisements