2 sides win with animal-cruelty bill

Advocates and opponents of updating Utah's animal cruelty statutes resumed a battle this year that's been waged for at least the last two legislative sessions, and people on both sides of the issue could claim victory with passage at the end.

SB297, a second proposal this session on the issue from Sen. Allen Christensen, R-North Ogden, creates a first-offense felony penalty for the crime of torturing a "companion animal," defined by the proposal as a domestic dog or cat. Previous Utah law did not provide for a felony-level punishment for any acts of animal abuse.

Lawmakers were inundated with e-mails and phone calls throughout the session as four different pieces of legislation attempted to address revamping current code.

The fine line lawmakers were aiming for was one that provided for a felony-level punishment for extreme animal abusers — the goal of animal rights advocates — but one that did not put members of the agriculture industry, particularly livestock growers, at risk of punishment for practices that are a normal part of their business.

Early proposals originating in the Senate successfully addressed each side of this line but were unable to bridge the gap. A compromise did not look possible early, but eventually one was worked out with the assistance of House Speaker Greg Curtis, R-Sandy, and Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr.

The first bill of the session, sponsored by Sen. Gene Davis, D-Salt Lake, had the full support of animal rights groups but came under fire from state agriculture interests. A second proposal, Christensen's first attempt, satisfied livestock growers but left animal advocates unsatisfied. The Christensen bill successfully passed a Senate committee hearing — one in which Davis' bill was left unheard — and a minor uproar ensued. After the maneuvering in the meeting, committee member Sen. Scott McCoy, D-Salt Lake, commented, "This is no way to run a Legislature."

After surviving the committee hearing, Christensen's bill passed the Senate floor, squeaking by with a last and deciding vote, breaking a 14-14 deadlock, issued by Senate President John Valentine, R-Orem. Valentine supported the bill after an amendment he championed in the committee hearing became part of the proposal.

After Senate passage, the bill languished in House Rules as pro-animal rights voices urged House Speaker Greg Curtis, R-Sandy, to halt its advance. In the meantime, a third piece of legislation was introduced by Rep. Sheryl Allen, R-Bountiful, who took a shot at creating a middle ground between the divisive Christensen/Davis proposals.