From Deseret News archives:

Would Utah firm open U.S. door to nuclear waste?

Matheson warns nation could become world's nuclear garbage dump

Published: Friday, Feb. 29, 2008 12:18 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — If the Utah company EnergySolutions is allowed to import large amounts of low-level radioactive waste from Italy, the United States could become a nuclear garbage dump for the world, say critics, including U.S. Reps. Jim Matheson and Bart Gordon.

"I recognize that small amounts of waste have been permitted entry into the U.S. in the past; however, encouraging other nations to actively pursue disposal options in the U.S. seems shortsighted at best," Matheson, D-Utah, wrote in a letter sent Thursday to Dale Klein, chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Opposition in Utah has been fierce at the grass-roots level, and the state's Radiation Control Board is also drafting a letter to Congress and the NRC.

Federal agencies, too, have pointed out concerns that the world in general is unprepared to deal with accumulating nuclear waste at all levels.

• Only 10 of 18 nations surveyed last year have disposal options for low-level nuclear waste, and none has options for all classes of such waste, according to the Government Accountability Office.

• According to a Nuclear Regulatory Commission analysis, the EnergySolutions plan is 25 times bigger than the largest previous import from outside North America.

Story continues below
"If this massive quantity from Italy is accepted, it just blows the doors wide open for nuclear waste to come in from all over the world," says Tom Clements, Southeast nuclear campaign coordinator for Friends of the Earth, an environmental group in Washington.

If approved, the company would ship up to 20,000 tons of metal piping, sludge, wood, contaminated clothing and other mildly radioactive material from Italian nuclear-power plants to Tennessee, process most of it, then dispose of the remainder in Utah. It would be by far America's largest import of nuclear waste.

The proposal, which entered a 30-day public-comment period on Feb. 11, is gathering opposition from environmentalists, regulators and members of Congress. It would not only pave the way for more such imports, critics say, but also give nations less incentive to take care of their own nuclear waste.

"The NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) has an obligation to deal with the waste generated in this country first and not accept foreign waste that fills up existing sites," Clements said.

Company's response

Recent comments

Do your research people. You want to help the Economy? Let it...

GET ON BOARD! | Feb. 17, 2009 at 1:04 p.m.

If you toxicate the usa with nucular waste where would animals live....

MM95 | Oct. 8, 2008 at 1:43 p.m.

I think the the Italians can keep their waste. The u.s does not need...

Hobo cheese wrestler | Oct. 8, 2008 at 1:38 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

I cannot wait for this Sunday. I have been waiting for 5 years to see my...

Man sentenced in child beating

Yes, he did it. But the natural mother was doing it before he did it....

2A: San Juan claims title

i thought since it was bad weather that would favor you guys now you are...

MWC expand? Get rid of deadweight

You failed to mention a couple of important facts in your comparison: Top...

Just 2 years ago the same stuff was being said regarding our coaches in...

"Think about the protestors of Tianamen Square. Were they Conservatives or...

I Call BS. The line "We have decades of history of women trying to engineer...

By the two rooks playing well the past few games, will not impact Sloan one...

President Obama believes that criticism makes him a better leader??? Wow...

1A and 2A sports is awesome! You have to be raised and have roots in these...

Advertisements
Advertisement