From Deseret News archives:

Developer renews fight to create Wasatch town

Published: Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2008 12:11 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The developer of a proposed resort town in rural Wasatch County attempted to resurrect his town's fight for creation Friday with a renewed appeal for intervention by Utah's Supreme Court.

Dean Sellers has refiled two writs in the Utah Supreme Court on grounds that his opponents, the town of Daniel and Wasatch County, admitted an error. The filing refers to a Feb. 12 letter sent by Daniel's attorney to the court. It corrected a mistake that showed a 6-foot strip of land between the town and annexation area. The strip did not in fact exist, according to Daniel Mayor Mike Duggin.

The annexation documents were made official by Utah's Lt. Gov. Gary Herbert's certification of them Feb. 12.

A week later, a partial court panel speaking for the Supreme Court denied Sellers' two writs and all attached briefs, saying Sellers hadn't proved that his case should bypass the district courts. Sellers believes that in light of the evidence of error, the entire court should reconsider the case.

Story continues below
The successful annexation halted Sellers' plans to build his town, which would have been a high-end skiing, shopping and recreation spot in the rural heart of Wasatch County. Sellers' plan was based on a controversial 2007 law allowing single property owners to create towns without a consent of a majority of the new town residents. That law will likely be amended soon to allow for a voting process. The amendment will likely not be retroactive.

The Storm Haven petition and a petition for incorporation of Aspen were filed Nov. 8, 2007, within hours of each other. The annexation petition was filed first, so the incorporation documents were denied, according to Supreme Court briefs.

Sellers insists that the annexation documents should have been denied based on the 6-foot error.

The town of Daniel believes the error was clerical in nature and that the court should stick to its decision to send Sellers to district court. The town has case law on its side, Duggin said.

Sellers and his attorneys believe the error constituted a modification. According to Utah law, if modifications are made to annexation petitions, they must be refiled. Therefore, Sellers' incorporation petition was filed first and should be allowed to proceed, according to the filings.


E-mail: rpalmer@desnews.com

Recent comments

Mr. Sellers would experience less opposition if he just left the...

RE: Jeff | Feb. 28, 2008 at 3:36 p.m.

Aspen. What a creative name for a town/resort! Why not call it...

Nick | Feb. 27, 2008 at 9:17 a.m.

Maybe Sellers should build a ski resort where there are mountains...

Utah skier | Feb. 27, 2008 at 8:59 a.m.

Image

Dean Sellers talks about the land he owns flanking U.S. 40 in Daniels Canyon outside Heber. He is hoping to create a resort.

previousnext

Latest comments

I hope Donny wins. His humility, courage and humor are very refreshing....

Boys basketball rankings

but it is Provo's Craig Drury polishing his 8 rings as head coach.

Expect epic clash on the line

Like the newspaper said, "...the first time since '84 national...

I think Mya did not deserve the nine's from the 3 judges on her free dance -...

College football will NEVER revert to the old bowl system. It has gone too...

We don't need another layer of government, which obviously represents more...

Utah GOP opposes ethics initiative

And this surprises someone? It's too easy in Utah to deceive the masses....

We cannot afford this monstrosity! Any claims that it will save money are...

I grew up in SLC and have always been a huge BYU fan. Honestly I can say most...

These are not essential government programs needed to ensure our national...

Advertisements